Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Fri September 02, 2022 12:46 am
oh wait I was responding to a different post, nm the info is still relevant
Tavistock was my GIC lmaoBi_3 wrote:Tavistock gender clinic ‘to be sued by 1,000 families`: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/4e7f ... 7a202c7457
It's not anti-trans to be concerned about this, it is pro-child to ensure children with gender dysphoria get the proper treatment (which might end up being blockers).
B is correct, I wrote the wrong number.B wrote:His decimal point is just in the wrong place. If the percentage of trans kids was 8%, the world would probably be very different.Mickey wrote:Your percentages are wrong here, there's way more fucking teenagers in America.Bi_3 wrote:B, roughly 8% of 13-17 year olds self-id as trans. That's over 300,000 kids. Do you really, really, really think it is remotely believable that only 5 of them play sports for their schools?
It's 0.8%.
B is not correct! It's 1.4%.Bi_3 wrote:B is correct, I wrote the wrong number.B wrote:His decimal point is just in the wrong place. If the percentage of trans kids was 8%, the world would probably be very different.Mickey wrote:Your percentages are wrong here, there's way more fucking teenagers in America.Bi_3 wrote:B, roughly 8% of 13-17 year olds self-id as trans. That's over 300,000 kids. Do you really, really, really think it is remotely believable that only 5 of them play sports for their schools?
It's 0.8%.
Source: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/ ... n-2022.pdf
No, B is right. We can just hand wave away any potential conflicts between rights based on immutable characteristics and those that want to extend those rights based on self ID.Mickey wrote:Though I agree *shudder* with bi_3. The idea that only 5 of the 300k trans teenagers play sports is obviously not true.
You're going to trigger B_i with that talk.Bammer wrote:You see the snake you cut the head off the snake.
You're the one in favor of cutting off body parts my friend.B wrote:You're going to trigger B_i with that talk.Bammer wrote:You see the snake you cut the head off the snake.
Thus I'm not triggered by the imagery of a beheaded snake.Bi_3 wrote:You're the one in favor of cutting off body parts my friend.B wrote:You're going to trigger B_i with that talk.Bammer wrote:You see the snake you cut the head off the snake.
Fair point. "Aroused" and "triggered" are not the same.B wrote:Thus I'm not triggered by the imagery of a beheaded snake.Bi_3 wrote:You're the one in favor of cutting off body parts my friend.B wrote:You're going to trigger B_i with that talk.Bammer wrote:You see the snake you cut the head off the snake.
Wait until he learns the nefarious activities undertaken by the discussion board Red Mosquito.spike wrote:
Well, that lasted less than a dayBurtReynolds wrote:Yeah their response was good.
They got a phone call from the people in charge.simple schoolboy wrote:Well, that lasted less than a dayBurtReynolds wrote:Yeah their response was good.
B wrote:It wasn't my claim. That's the number put forth by Save Women's Sports.
My opinion is, if you formed a foundation to solve this societal evil, maybe you should be able to show more than 5 occurrences nationwide, or you can just fuck right off.