Red Mosquito

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

The Argonaut wrote:

warehouse wrote:are we still doing this? i thought everyone saw puff daddy brokered a truce at the after party

Who is RM's Diddy? Who shall broker the truce between tree and Ms. Harmless?

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

you took away the word "class" and you're accusing me of "now" doing what? writing a brief sentence?

tree_ wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

tree_ wrote:There's nothing more racist than determining an entire personhood based on skin color

colour-blindness isn't anti-racist

it's also not necessarily racist, while the former definitely is

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

you took away the word "class" and you're accusing me of "now" doing what? writing a brief sentence?

Legitimate question: are you thick?

Ms Harmless wrote:

tree_ wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

tree_ wrote:There's nothing more racist than determining an entire personhood based on skin color

colour-blindness isn't anti-racist

it's also not necessarily racist, while the former definitely is

OK Tree

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

you took away the word "class" and you're accusing me of "now" doing what? writing a brief sentence?

Legitimate question: are you thick?

maybe I'm one of your fucking "mouth-breathers", you reckon?

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

you took away the word "class" and you're accusing me of "now" doing what? writing a brief sentence?

Legitimate question: are you thick?

maybe I'm one of your fucking "mouth-breathers", you reckon?

You're displaying all the quick wit and thoughtful consideration of the nasally-challenged.

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Now who's the reductionist.

still you

Oh is that so?

Ms Harmless wrote:that is the only power differential in effect here

you do know that "class reductionist" means something specific, right? it doesn't just mean you can write short sentences

Please read more carefully.

you took away the word "class" and you're accusing me of "now" doing what? writing a brief sentence?

Legitimate question: are you thick?

maybe I'm one of your fucking "mouth-breathers", you reckon?

You're displaying all the quick wit and thoughtful consideration of the nasally-challenged.

Malloy wrote:

Rob wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:normalizing violence against a black man in a room full of white people post-george floyd is not ok, and seems pretty inconsistent w my vague notions of your politics, harmless

we're not talking about white violence against Black men

love how Will Smith's Blackness *and* Jada's Blackness is being erased here to defend a guy whose LOLs we crave

love how you’re erasing assault against a black man on television!

by a black man!!!!!

normalizing the assault & oppression of black men, by thomas jefferson or clarence thomas, is not ok. never took you for a reactionary

I feel like this is what happens when people are trying to make things about race rather than seeing actual racism. But what do I know?

seems like posters like you and harmless and Burt don’t want to see what’s right in front of you. typical online right wing hijinks

Ms Harmless wrote:Mickey doesn't understand class reductionism and thinks people who don't entertain his bullshit are mouth breathers with no education

Mickey wrote:Incorrect.

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:Mickey doesn't understand class reductionism and thinks people who don't entertain his bullshit are mouth breathers with no education

For starters you have been drawn into my bullshit and entertained it for well near 40 pages now.

Rob wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Rob wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:normalizing violence against a black man in a room full of white people post-george floyd is not ok, and seems pretty inconsistent w my vague notions of your politics, harmless

we're not talking about white violence against Black men

love how Will Smith's Blackness *and* Jada's Blackness is being erased here to defend a guy whose LOLs we crave

love how you’re erasing assault against a black man on television!

by a black man!!!!!

normalizing the assault & oppression of black men, by thomas jefferson or clarence thomas, is not ok. never took you for a reactionary

I feel like this is what happens when people are trying to make things about race rather than seeing actual racism. But what do I know?

seems like posters like you and harmless and Burt don’t want to see what’s right in front of you. typical online right wing hijinks

Did you even read this thread? That's a weird takeaway.

Bammer wrote:Incredible thread. 53 pages in only 3 days. Wow!

By the way that Will Smith thing was total scripted to create buzz around an otherwise dead Oscars. You fools have obviously taken the bait.

Malloy wrote:

Rob wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Rob wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Malloy wrote:normalizing violence against a black man in a room full of white people post-george floyd is not ok, and seems pretty inconsistent w my vague notions of your politics, harmless

we're not talking about white violence against Black men

love how Will Smith's Blackness *and* Jada's Blackness is being erased here to defend a guy whose LOLs we crave

love how you’re erasing assault against a black man on television!

by a black man!!!!!

normalizing the assault & oppression of black men, by thomas jefferson or clarence thomas, is not ok. never took you for a reactionary

I feel like this is what happens when people are trying to make things about race rather than seeing actual racism. But what do I know?

seems like posters like you and harmless and Burt don’t want to see what’s right in front of you. typical online right wing hijinks

Did you even read this thread? That's a weird takeaway.

that was ungenerous. *posters like verb, harmless and burt