Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Mon July 03, 2017 8:41 pm
Hollywood is an industry. Of course they want money. Star Wars is multi-BILLION dollar franchise. Disney didn't buy it Lucas because they give a shit about art.
Keep going, I'm almost thereRangi Guy wrote:I was just getting at that this whole project isn't so much movie making as it merchandise advertising
But now they're scared to take risks cause they want to sell > 100 lunchboxes with some character from the film slapped on the liddurdencommatyler wrote:Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
The merchandising of Star Wars was a brilliant move. I'm not gonna throw shit at Lucas for figuring out how to maximize his income and exploit the market. Good on him. It's part of what makes him a genius.Rangi Guy wrote:But now they're scared to take risks cause they want to sell > 100 lunchboxes with some character from the film slapped on the liddurdencommatyler wrote:Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
I'm very cynical!durdencommatyler wrote:The merchandising of Star Wars was a brilliant move. I'm not gonna throw shit at Lucas for figuring out how to maximize his income and exploit the market. Good on him. It's part of what makes him a genius.Rangi Guy wrote:But now they're scared to take risks cause they want to sell > 100 lunchboxes with some character from the film slapped on the liddurdencommatyler wrote:Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
But I also think this notion that Star Wars films exist solely to sell toys is a little ridiculous. That's a narrow and cynical point of view.
I love you no matter what.Rangi Guy wrote:I'm very cynical!durdencommatyler wrote:The merchandising of Star Wars was a brilliant move. I'm not gonna throw shit at Lucas for figuring out how to maximize his income and exploit the market. Good on him. It's part of what makes him a genius.Rangi Guy wrote:But now they're scared to take risks cause they want to sell > 100 lunchboxes with some character from the film slapped on the liddurdencommatyler wrote:Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
But I also think this notion that Star Wars films exist solely to sell toys is a little ridiculous. That's a narrow and cynical point of view.
durdencommatyler wrote:I love you no matter what.Rangi Guy wrote:I'm very cynical!durdencommatyler wrote:The merchandising of Star Wars was a brilliant move. I'm not gonna throw shit at Lucas for figuring out how to maximize his income and exploit the market. Good on him. It's part of what makes him a genius.Rangi Guy wrote:But now they're scared to take risks cause they want to sell > 100 lunchboxes with some character from the film slapped on the liddurdencommatyler wrote:Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
But I also think this notion that Star Wars films exist solely to sell toys is a little ridiculous. That's a narrow and cynical point of view.
is there any evidence at all that this is a thing?Rangi Guy wrote:As long as they can market toys I'm sure the studio is going to be happy. These days the film itself seems to be a secondary consideration
The Force Awakensstip wrote:is there any evidence at all that this is a thing?Rangi Guy wrote:As long as they can market toys I'm sure the studio is going to be happy. These days the film itself seems to be a secondary consideration