Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Tue July 25, 2017 8:32 pm
It's a backup guard on a minimum contract. Why does everyone have a problem with this? Shouldn't Cavs fans be more worried about fucking dipshit Kyrie?
they should trade him for wigginsverb_to_trust wrote:It's a backup guard on a minimum contract. Why does everyone have a problem with this? Shouldn't Cavs fans be more worried about fucking dipshit Kyrie?
It would never happen but it would kind of be fun to see him and John Wall together because they are so fast.Monkey_Driven wrote:Lebron would destroy Wiggins' fragile psyche. I want Kyrie to go to a mediocre East team and still struggle to be .500.
Why would the Suns trade for a guy who won't stay? Why would anyone? Once this Flat Earthing dolt realizes that the Superteam is his one and only God it will be back to a very very short list when his contract is up: GSWJoesanity wrote:I'd take some kind of deal with Phoenix that lands them Jackson. The Suns said they won't deal him, but I don't know how much I believe that.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Bump to get above the Big 3 thread
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Bump to get above the Big 3 thread
I'll go with 50%, only because he has two years left on his deal and some team will offer an attractive offer.4/5 wrote:% chance Kyrie actually gets traded this offseason?
I'm going with 30%.
Cleveland has some shitty contracts on their roster. I could see them packaging one or two of those along with Kyrie to be able to free stuff up for the future.4/5 wrote:If Cleveland really thinks LeBron is going to leave next summer would they dare take a deal that is more overtly about the future than attempting to win now? It would be a very bold gambit to say the least.
I also think that if they do trade Kyrie that there's a 50% chance that they also trade Love.
I agree about the Love thing.4/5 wrote:If Cleveland really thinks LeBron is going to leave next summer would they dare take a deal that is more overtly about the future than attempting to win now? It would be a very bold gambit to say the least.
I also think that if they do trade Kyrie that there's a 50% chance that they also trade Love.
4/5 wrote:If Cleveland really thinks LeBron is going to leave next summer would they dare take a deal that is more overtly about the future than attempting to win now? It would be a very bold gambit to say the least.
I also think that if they do trade Kyrie that there's a 50% chance that they also trade Love.
This logic makes sense too. I wonder if there is a move out there than can make them better for this season, good enough to give the Warriors a tougher test. If there's not it may be smarter to build for the future and try to shed a Shumpert or JR Smith contract.Electromatic wrote:If they think the best basketball player they will ever see in town is going to leave after next year they should be spending every last dime to try and win another championship and take full advantage of the time they have with that player. It would be absolutely foolish to think about "the future" It will never be better than this for Cleveland. Win now. Spend Now. Just my opinion anyway.4/5 wrote:If Cleveland really thinks LeBron is going to leave next summer would they dare take a deal that is more overtly about the future than attempting to win now? It would be a very bold gambit to say the least.
I also think that if they do trade Kyrie that there's a 50% chance that they also trade Love.