Red Mosquito

ouch

Haha Burt had to do car karaoke.

tragabigzanda wrote:It’s definitely Joy Behar. She co-hosts The View and I’m pretty sure Dev did whippets with her when she skied BC.

i can't stop thinking about this.

Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?

I'd say her complaint is valid but I find the overall similar to declining a penalty in football.

Hopefully she gets well soon.

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?

Bammer has no idea what STI is

Bammer wrote:

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?

Bammer has no idea what STI is

Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.

wease wrote:

Bammer wrote:

wease wrote:Here’s one:

We have a patient that is upset that we did an STI test on her. When she came in, she specifically asked that she only be tested for a couple other things but not STI. Well, for some reason, we did the STI anyway. So, she’s completely entitled to be upset about it. However, her results came back positive. So if we hadn’t done the test, yes against her wishes and I don’t know why it was done, we wouldn’t have learned she was positive and wouldn’t have been able to treat her for it.

So is her complaint valid?

Bammer has no idea what STI is

Sexually Transmitted Infection. What we used to call STD.

Sounds like that ungrateful slut doesn’t know what’s good for her

If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.

Bi_3 wrote:If the result was reported back to her insurance it's totally understandable to be pissed.

Results have to be entered into charts or we can’t bill for the testing.

What’s Professor Kershnar think?

wat

I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.

Spike is apparently very familiar.

could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault

Bammer wrote:I googled the guy and it has something to do with pedophiles.

Spike is apparently very familiar.

just some subtle thread integration pal

Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault

Oh it was our fault, no doubt.

wease wrote:

Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault

Oh it was our fault, no doubt.

you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

wease wrote:

Peeps wrote:could it be she was trying to keep it secret hence why she specified not to test for it? im no chris or birds but i would think the outcome is moot but that all that should be looked at is who is at fault

Oh it was our fault, no doubt.

you may as well just screen grab and print this page and slap an "EXHIBIT A" sticker on the bottom.

I’ve said from the get go we did it by mistake.

Looks like all she’s wanting is her lab bill to be fixed. Should be an easy enough process however, we don’t own the lab or anything so it’s not as simple as me saying “do away with these charges.”

Life is so frickin complicated.