Red Mosquito

tragabigzanda wrote:Plowing right through is what these guys do best.

Republicans have to be aware that Democrats are going to be more eager to pack the court if they do plow it through.

I just read an article that made light of the fact that it wasn't until 1984 that states started changing the drinking age from 18 to 21. 1986 was the cutoff date.

the 2nd half of Bart O'Kavanaugh's senior year he was 18 and legally allowed to buy and consume

hence the treasurer of the keg club

attempted rape aside, should someone be shat on for buying kegs and drinking them when it was legal to do so?

the answer is clearly yes

You’ll see on my calendar here from when I was 17 that I did not attend an underage drinking party and also that I definitely did not go to see Titanic twice while it was in the theaters.

welp

Who's on deck?

BurtReynolds wrote:

GOP either did not do their due diligence on this guy or they did and Trump really wanted him because he is mas puervo as well

“I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” Ramirez said of the incident. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She told the New Yorker that she remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”

https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/ ... 202954080/

tragabigzanda wrote: *3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)

wait - what's this one? link?

always cite your sources.

Spoiler: show

it's the backbone of the Pete T. internet research method

It's in the New Yorker story.

yeah i see it now

gross

tragabigzanda wrote:So there's:

1. Dr. Ford
2. Deborah Ramirez
*3. Mark Ford's ex-girlfriend's account of a gangbang style assault on a drunken woman (Kavanaugh is one of the perpetrators)
*4. Michael Avenatti's as-yet unnamed client

*Avenatti has clarified that his client is not Deborah Ramirez, but it's unclear if his client is the same woman as #3.

So that's 3 or 4 accusations now. Surely that's enough to sink this guy, right?

We mustn't succumb to these accounts only because it is politically expedient, trag.

the GOP are dumb af for nominating this guy

they should have just found some nerd

these women the GOP are attempting to delegitimize - these aren't porn stars or playmates or whatever

these are upper class / ivy league women

not the same impact as disparaging the Trump's entertainment industry tramps

these are the children of 'landed elites'. you can't just shit on these people and not experience backlash from the upper rings of society

they have a socio-economic network, credentials, degrees, etc

GOP stepped in shit bigtime with this one

Well this is going well

Yeah, I was kidding. It was a reference to a previous post.