Page 56 of 57
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Wed May 14, 2025 11:50 pm
by VinylGuy
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Hearing Severed Hand last night was so great. And they nailed it. The crowd seemed to love it as well. More from this album, please.
yeah, thats a banger live. Wish they did it more often. I would love for them to also play Life Wasted, Unemployable and at least Inside Job on a regular basis.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 7:56 am
by dimejinky99
Anders wrote:They had some good things going for them in this period, but ultimately, the album was a disappointment.
It just didn’t work did it? All felt so forced and contrived.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 1:26 pm
by liebzz
It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 1:28 pm
by VinylGuy
yeah, the only issue i have is the production. Everything else, i love it. The album, the tour cycle, the fucking press!! they did rolling stone, snl, letterman were they played a whole set, Aol sessions, Jolls Holland...magic.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 2:10 pm
by wease
liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 2:16 pm
by liebzz
wease wrote:liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.
I think we have similar thoughts here. If it had a little character, be it the warm sound of No Code, the abrasive sound of Vitalogy, or even the murkiness of Riot Act, it would have a feeling to it rather than seemingly antiseptic which the album is definitely not going for in substance.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 2:54 pm
by wease
liebzz wrote:wease wrote:liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.
I think we have similar thoughts here. If it had a little character, be it the warm sound of No Code, the abrasive sound of Vitalogy, or even the murkiness of Riot Act, it would have a feeling to it rather than seemingly antiseptic which the album is definitely not going for in substance.
Yeah. Comes across like a flat thud.
I still love most of the tunes tho.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:21 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
It is a shame because all of the ST songs I've seen live have always been fun and incredible. Such a huge difference between the album and live. Also, I wish they'd bring Comatose back!
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:29 pm
by stip
Inside Job in particular is a song that is just fine on the record and kills live
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:29 pm
by stip
in fact Inside Job may be the single song most elevated in a live setting.
that or Unthought Known
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:30 pm
by VinylGuy
E.H. Ruddock wrote:It is a shame because all of the ST songs I've seen live have always been fun and incredible. Such a huge difference between the album and live. Also, I wish they'd bring Comatose back!
yeah, thats another one i would love to have it live...Big Wave too.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:36 pm
by Kevin Davis
I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 3:47 pm
by wease
Kevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
Binaural is up there for me too
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 4:09 pm
by stip
Kevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
even parachutes?
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 6:19 pm
by Kevin Davis
stip wrote:Kevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
even parachutes?
Hmmm, good call...coin toss, but I think so. Listening to the studio version now (whatever mix is on YouTube), and I am not sure I'd ever realized that Ed's vocals were double-tracked throughout the song. The instrumental embellishments come across really nice on the studio recording, but I think I still prefer the more organic feel of a good live take (if memory serves, Torino '06 is the one to take to the bank).
wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Thu May 15, 2025 11:05 pm
by wease
Kevin Davis wrote:
wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
Yeah. Except for Insignificance, which I loved from first listen as the b-side of NAIS, I wasn’t very keen on much else from the studio. Then those boots started coming out and more and more I started really getting into the tunes. And now I consider it a masterpiece.
Interestingly, Sad was a tune I didn’t care one way or the other about until I saw it live for the first time at the Gorge in ‘05. After that, it moved up into top 10 and possibly top 5 for me. I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Sat May 17, 2025 11:33 am
by liebzz
wease wrote:Kevin Davis wrote:
wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
Yeah. Except for Insignificance, which I loved from first listen as the b-side of NAIS, I wasn’t very keen on much else from the studio. Then those boots started coming out and more and more I started really getting into the tunes. And now I consider it a masterpiece.
Interestingly, Sad was a tune I didn’t care one way or the other about until I saw it live for the first time at the Gorge in ‘05. After that, it moved up into top 10 and possibly top 5 for me. I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
Yeah that’s completely normal to me. I didn’t care either way about Bruce Springsteen and went to see him because of his live reputation. Walked out of that show a huge fan for life.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Sat May 17, 2025 2:10 pm
by McParadigm
That’s funny. I went to see Springsteen on the reunion tour, and left thinking “huh, I wonder what people get out of that.” Then one day I was on a CD buying binge and I bought The River.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Sat May 17, 2025 5:29 pm
by Happy Trees
wease wrote:I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
It's because the production on the studio album sucked. And it has never sucked worse than it sucks right now.
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Posted: Sun May 18, 2025 12:00 am
by liebzz
McParadigm wrote:That’s funny. I went to see Springsteen on the reunion tour, and left thinking “huh, I wonder what people get out of that.” Then one day I was on a CD buying binge and I bought The River.
Good ol’ Columbia House.