Page 56 of 110
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Mon August 29, 2022 2:36 am
by elliseamos
*accept
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Mon August 29, 2022 2:37 am
by elliseamos
simple schoolboy wrote:Ukraine's maximalist position (regaining Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk) seem entirely unachievable without NATO getting involved with at a minimum an air campaign. Maybe that position makes some sense in that Russia's demands are totally incoherent and it's not clear what terms they would except for something as minimal as a temporary ceasefire.
The West is running out of relevant artillery and other systems to provide, even with mobilization and foreign training, what are the Ukrainians going to use to retake all this territory?
elliseamos wrote:*accept
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Mon August 29, 2022 2:59 am
by simple schoolboy
Thanks for the save.
How quickly will Europe throw Ukraine under the bus when they have to pay higher energy costs? Maybe don't elect anti nuclear/ anti fracking green parties that are funded by Russia next time.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Wed August 31, 2022 7:47 pm
by elliseamos
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Wed August 31, 2022 11:22 pm
by 96583UP
simple schoolboy wrote:Thanks for the save.
How quickly will Europe throw Ukraine under the bus when they have to pay higher energy costs? Maybe don't elect anti nuclear/ anti fracking green parties that are funded by Russia next time.
yup
gonna be a chilly winter in the eurozone
will see if the currency can survive this one
good thing the green party convinced us all that nuclear was bad
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Thu September 01, 2022 5:38 pm
by Angus
simple schoolboy wrote:Thanks for the save.
How quickly will Europe throw Ukraine under the bus when they have to pay higher energy costs? Maybe don't elect anti nuclear/ anti fracking green parties that are funded by Russia next time.
To be honest, coming from Belgium:
I'm not that scared for a chilly winter. Although that might be because I'm in a financially good position. I'm more scared for the economic consequences of these insane energy prices and for the impact on our next elections.
Yes, voting on green parties was bad. But they didn't make these decisions on their own. Belgium decided to stop nuclear 20 years ago. Not a single government since (and the green party hasn't been in a government since) has turned back that decision.
As to Ukraine. I'm currently (re-)reading these two books. We were never really taught much about that. The war ended in 45 and all was well in Europe. It's sickening what happened in the east. I hope we don't let them starve again.

Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sat September 03, 2022 4:40 am
by simple schoolboy
Angus wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:Thanks for the save.
How quickly will Europe throw Ukraine under the bus when they have to pay higher energy costs? Maybe don't elect anti nuclear/ anti fracking green parties that are funded by Russia next time.
To be honest, coming from Belgium:
I'm not that scared for a chilly winter. Although that might be because I'm in a financially good position. I'm more scared for the economic consequences of these insane energy prices and for the impact on our next elections.
Yes, voting on green parties was bad. But they didn't make these decisions on their own. Belgium decided to stop nuclear 20 years ago. Not a single government since (and the green party hasn't been in a government since) has turned back that decision.
As to Ukraine. I'm currently (re-)reading these two books. We were never really taught much about that. The war ended in 45 and all was well in Europe. It's sickening what happened in the east. I hope we don't let them starve again.

There's a space between the Birchers went too far, and Communism was bad, actually. You now find yourself in that spot in a European context, may God have mercy on your soul.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Wed September 07, 2022 5:47 pm
by Stickman
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Thu September 08, 2022 1:49 pm
by BurtReynolds
Lol what is that article?
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Thu September 08, 2022 6:34 pm
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:Lol what is that article?
Only the finest from MSN Starts Newsweek collaboration, duh.
The Russians are pretty demoralized but they still have mountains of rusting equipment to throw into the breach.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Fri September 09, 2022 4:04 am
by simple schoolboy
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Fri September 09, 2022 8:01 pm
by simple schoolboy
Ukrainian troops reported to have reached the outskirts of Izyum. Things not looking too good for Russia in the East.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sat September 10, 2022 12:36 am
by Stickman
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sat September 10, 2022 2:38 am
by simple schoolboy
This is actually better driving than what Venezuela displayed at the tank biathalon. They shoulda brought this guy in as a ringer.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sat September 10, 2022 6:23 pm
by elliseamos
Axios wrote:The Russian Defense Ministry said Saturday that it had removed forces away from areas outside the major Ukrainian city Kharkiv, a major development in the ongoing war. Ukraine may have taken thousands of square miles of territory in what might have been the fastest breakthrough in months.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun September 11, 2022 1:14 am
by McParadigm
There are a lot of people dunking on “Ukraine is finished” takes from the last few months, which I think is dumb (except for a few instances like Tucker, where the takes were more like cheerleading than analysis). But it is really remarkable what has happened in the last few days…the scope of success is so great that organizations are hedging their reporting on it, half expecting it to turn out to be a fog of war misunderstanding or flat out misinformation.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun September 11, 2022 2:38 am
by simple schoolboy
McParadigm wrote:There are a lot of people dunking on “Ukraine is finished” takes from the last few months, which I think is dumb (except for a few instances like Tucker, where the takes were more like cheerleading than analysis). But it is really remarkable what has happened in the last few days…the scope of success is so great that organizations are hedging their reporting on it, half expecting it to turn out to be a fog of war misunderstanding or flat out misinformation.
They were on the back foot for quite a while, but they never lost as much territory as quickly as they have recently regained in recent days, outside of maybe late February.
There are tankie true believers that cheer Russia on, but the America first objections are not without (limited) merit. Will we claw back some of those HIMARS/ GMLRSs and Javelins until they are replaced by new production? Carl Gustavs were reportedly taken out of active duty SOF units to get sent to Ukraine.
This is maybe less of a concern in that any possible conflict in Asia will be Navy and Airforce centric. We don't have massive reserves of these systems, so it was sensible to limit the supply until we had some confidence that Ukraine would prevail, and that seems to be a hopeful, maybe even likely scenario.
On the material losses of the Russians:
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun September 11, 2022 4:57 pm
by dimejinky99
Rumours of mass desertion and mutiny.
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun September 11, 2022 5:34 pm
by dimejinky99
Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun September 11, 2022 5:44 pm
by dimejinky99
It seems this mutiny might be going all the way to the top.
Are they gonna take him out?