We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
TV: The Walking Dead
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8618
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
it would suck for anyone that didn't watch the walking dead, but watched better call saul last night. i dont even watch TWD and some of the bigger moments mentioned here were all shown at some point during commercials
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Carl is basically an adult now, right? They should go ahead and off him.Kaius wrote:Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10399
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Is it normal that my immediate reaction to that was "Ugh, finally!" or is that weird?Kaius wrote:Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Uhhphilpritchard wrote:Is it normal that my immediate reaction to that was "Ugh, finally!" or is that weird?Kaius wrote:Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
I mean... if it was a real kid getting eaten by real zombies, I wouldn't have reacted that way. If that changes anything.Kaius wrote:Uhhphilpritchard wrote:Is it normal that my immediate reaction to that was "Ugh, finally!" or is that weird?Kaius wrote:Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Normally bad stuff happening to kids on TV bothers me but that kid was annoying. It didn't help that the emotion of the scene was somewhat undercut but editing and direction choices.
- Rangi Guy
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
- Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
philpritchard wrote:Is it normal that my immediate reaction to that was "Ugh, finally!" or is that weird?Kaius wrote:Oh, I wasn't surprised at all. I was just interested in the fact that they finally broke down that boundary. I think tv ratings execs definitely view adult and adolescent death scenes very differently, so I found it at least somewhat significant. There are recognizable differences in emotional impact when you see a child killed vs seeing one as a zombie, seeing one recently dead, or hearing one die off screen. I find it all quite interesting.@SkitchP wrote:Kaius wrote:Right, but I think this is the first time we actually see a kid get brutally murdered.@SkitchP wrote:We saw Sophia after the fact. And I think there might have been a couple kids in the prison. This show is totes cool with killing kids.Kaius wrote:Was Sam the first child they showed get zombie-d?
You could be right, but it's not like we didnt all see it coming, and we all hated that kid. I think the Sophia zombie and the Crazy Bitch killing her little sister and subsequently getting killed by carol was far more impactful. Seeing sam get eaten really didnt do anything more than any asshole character getting it.

"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Yeah, you could tell he was going to die at some point, and it seemed like it was going to be soon. In the meantime he was endangering the other characters and annoying me as a viewer, so the extent of my reaction was basically "There, now we can move on." It was the first "good guy" death that's made me feel that way.bada wrote:Normally bad stuff happening to kids on TV bothers me but that kid was annoying. It didn't help that the emotion of the scene was somewhat undercut but editing and direction choices.
I was disappointed that it resulted in Jessie's death, though.
- AndySlash
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:42 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
where were they going, by the way (i don't recall from the mid-season episode), and why did it take so long to get there? the leave the house in daylight and when that shit goes down it's night. even if it went from daylight to night in an hour, it doesn't take a fucking hour to meander across alexandria no matter where they were:

and on the saying 'fuck' discussion from earlier, the oj simpson series on fx dropped a 'motherfucker' on us last night. but walking dead can't. ok then.

and on the saying 'fuck' discussion from earlier, the oj simpson series on fx dropped a 'motherfucker' on us last night. but walking dead can't. ok then.
ah, copperplate, a font for the truly modern man.
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10399
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
I noticed that too. Got dark awfully fast just going 2 streets over.AndySlash wrote:where were they going, by the way (i don't recall from the mid-season episode), and why did it take so long to get there? the leave the house in daylight and when that shit goes down it's night. even if it went from daylight to night in an hour, it doesn't take a fucking hour to meander across alexandria no matter where they were:
.
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
I guess it's cool to post this now. Such a brutal, awe-shock moment in the book.


- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35957
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
guys, zombies. a show about zombies.Stickman wrote:I noticed that too. Got dark awfully fast just going 2 streets over.AndySlash wrote:where were they going, by the way (i don't recall from the mid-season episode), and why did it take so long to get there? the leave the house in daylight and when that shit goes down it's night. even if it went from daylight to night in an hour, it doesn't take a fucking hour to meander across alexandria no matter where they were:
.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
Just because you're telling a science fiction story based in the real world doesn't mean you have an end all excuse for any logical fallacies that are incorporated into a show; like what time of day it is from one end of an episode to the next. It's just lazy.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: TV: The Walking Dead
That map seems wrong to me. But the argument still holds.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.

