Re: The 46th POTUS - Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Posted: Fri January 28, 2022 11:35 pm
I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Mental illness is for realsChris_H_2 wrote:I can’t believe there aren’t conspiracy theories being touted already that this was sabotage.
You might be thinking for a treeB wrote:I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Depends on the bridge, of course. But According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, "most of the country’s bridges were designed for a lifespan of 50 years." So...B wrote:I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Certainly that group has an agenda, so grains of salt are necessary but that's interesting.Mickey wrote:Depends on the bridge, of course. But According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, "most of the country’s bridges were designed for a lifespan of 50 years." So...B wrote:I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Certainly! And yet. The bridge that collapsed today was built in 1973.4/5 wrote:Certainly that group has an agenda, so grains of salt are necessary but that's interesting.Mickey wrote:Depends on the bridge, of course. But According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, "most of the country’s bridges were designed for a lifespan of 50 years." So...B wrote:I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Maybe these conspiracy theorists are on to something!Mickey wrote:Certainly! And yet. The bridge that collapsed today was built in 1973.4/5 wrote:Certainly that group has an agenda, so grains of salt are necessary but that's interesting.Mickey wrote:Depends on the bridge, of course. But According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, "most of the country’s bridges were designed for a lifespan of 50 years." So...B wrote:I wouldn't have thought 50 years was old for a bridge.
Mickey wrote:I would volunteer for Biden if he ran on the platform of "I'm going to blow up every bridge around Pittsburg and turn it into a new Alcatraz."
spell it right foolMickey wrote:I would volunteer for Biden if he ran on the platform of "I'm going to blow up every bridge around Pittsburg and turn it into a new Alcatraz."
Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
PissburghPeeps wrote:spell it right foolMickey wrote:I would volunteer for Biden if he ran on the platform of "I'm going to blow up every bridge around Pittsburg and turn it into a new Alcatraz."
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-82645099JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
What half-remembered Newsmax headline are you referencing here?
Bammer wrote:https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-82645099JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
What half-remembered Newsmax headline are you referencing here?
He’s gotten everything else right so far. He’ll undoubtedly crush this as well.JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-82645099JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
What half-remembered Newsmax headline are you referencing here?
What a monster
Not as far-fetched as you might believe:Bammer wrote:He’s gotten everything else right so far. He’ll undoubtedly crush this as well.JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-82645099JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
What half-remembered Newsmax headline are you referencing here?
What a monster
Biden aims to reduce cancer deaths by 50% over next 25 years
The American Cancer Society estimates there will be 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths this year. Biden is essentially aiming to to save more than 300,000 lives annually, which the administration believes is possible because the age-adjusted death rate has already fallen by roughly 25% over the past two decades. The cancer death rate is currently 146 per 100,000 people, compared with nearly 200 in 2000.
Looking forward, better public health practices, reducing cancer risks such as smoking and informing people about the best cancer research could mean fewer deaths. Brawley said one of his studies found that 130,000 people die annually from cancer because they do not benefit from known science.
Not here to defend Joe Biden, who sucks and will soon be in the dustheap of history where he belongs, but you gotta at least do the reading you post, homie.But the administration believes it can curb cancer through efforts such as increased screening and removing inequities in treatment. The coronavirus pandemic has consumed health care resources and caused people to miss more than 9.5 million cancer screenings.
Mickey wrote:Not as far-fetched as you might believe:Bammer wrote:He’s gotten everything else right so far. He’ll undoubtedly crush this as well.JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory ... s-82645099JuanHamm wrote:Bammer wrote:Renowned scientist Joe Biden is gonna cure cancer by 50%. Amazing! Too bad this guy only recently surfaced on the national scene and hasn’t been in a position of influence for decades.
What half-remembered Newsmax headline are you referencing here?
What a monster
Biden aims to reduce cancer deaths by 50% over next 25 yearsThe American Cancer Society estimates there will be 1,918,030 new cancer cases and 609,360 cancer deaths this year. Biden is essentially aiming to to save more than 300,000 lives annually, which the administration believes is possible because the age-adjusted death rate has already fallen by roughly 25% over the past two decades. The cancer death rate is currently 146 per 100,000 people, compared with nearly 200 in 2000.Looking forward, better public health practices, reducing cancer risks such as smoking and informing people about the best cancer research could mean fewer deaths. Brawley said one of his studies found that 130,000 people die annually from cancer because they do not benefit from known science.Not here to defend Joe Biden, who sucks and will soon be in the dustheap of history where he belongs, but you gotta at least do the reading you post, homie.But the administration believes it can curb cancer through efforts such as increased screening and removing inequities in treatment. The coronavirus pandemic has consumed health care resources and caused people to miss more than 9.5 million cancer screenings.
Bammer wrote:I read the headlines. If you’re expecting me to get details from the article, you’re barking up the wrong tree.Rangi Guy wrote:Not yet they aren'tBammer wrote:Borders are open babyRangi Guy wrote:Huh?Bammer wrote:Congratulations to New Zealand on defeating COVID-19