Arcade Fire

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by BurtReynolds »

EJ wrote:This is going to be a joke. I'd be surprised if there's more than 25% participation in this nonsense.
i think they'd view 25% as a smashing success.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by EJ »

BurtReynolds wrote:
EJ wrote:This is going to be a joke. I'd be surprised if there's more than 25% participation in this nonsense.
i think they'd view 25% as a smashing success.
I hope not. I hope they get pissed off. I'm looking to get berated via binoculars way up in Section 214 at Barclays.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by stip »

harmless wrote:
Brett wrote:I've found parts of every album after Funeral to be enjoyable, but failing to engage on the whole, and this one is no different. Ultimately, I think disc one is more successful, and probably would have made a fine album on its own. The concert dress code thing goes along with this double album format to show that these guys definitely have some out-there ambitions, and are actively seeking to cultivate their artistic existence in a very specific fashion, but it's way too heavy-handed for me.

I don't have time to waste indulging something that doesn't reciprocate. I won't say that I'm done with this band, because they keep managing to string me along almost ten years after they were relevant to me, but I'm going to keep my interaction with the music at arm's length.
To be fair, during this tour you're not really seeing Arcade Fire, you're seeing 'The Reflektors', their concept-album concept-band. So you dress up as well. I'm sure it's just part of the fun for this particular album, and nothing to do with any future ambitions. They'll most probably go back to being Arcade Fire for the next one, with perfectly normal attire expected at gigs.
look, this is still pretentious hipster douchiness. that's just the justification for it
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by stip »

theplatypus wrote:
Strat wrote:How is humiliating a person dying for attention and flashing her tits at a show even remotely pretentious or in the same league as making your audience show up in specific well dressed attire?
Making fun of the size of a girl's breasts is several dozen notches above implementing a dress code for your show in the asshole scale.

absolutely! but it is NOT pretentious.


I see strat had this covered.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Harry Lime »

BurtReynolds wrote:I doubt anyone gets kicked out over it.

And no one is getting kicked out. It was just a request from the band (or Win), not a command. What is everyone getting bent out of shape for?
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Strat »

Harry Lime wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:I doubt anyone gets kicked out over it.

And no one is getting kicked out. It was just a request from the band (or Win), not a command. What is everyone getting bent out of shape for?

i dont think anyone is bent out of shape. basically its just like any pearl jam argument:

Dont like the band: This is another reason why we dont and we will hammer that point home because we are on the internet
Do like the band: This is utterly pointless thing to discuss
Last edited by Strat on Tue November 19, 2013 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37454
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Norah »

Just got an email from LiveNation:

Arcade Fire:
Reflektor Tour

Tuesday, August 19
Comcast Center

Presale starts: Thu, Nov 21 at 10am
Presale ends: Thu, Nov 21 at 10pm
Use Password: turkey
Public On Sale: Fri, Nov 22 at 10am
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Harry Lime »

Strat wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:I doubt anyone gets kicked out over it.

And no one is getting kicked out. It was just a request from the band (or Win), not a command. What is everyone getting bent out of shape for?

i dont think anyone is bent out of shape. basically its just like any pearl jam argument:

Dont like the band: This is another reason why we dont and we will hammer that point home because we are on the internet
Do like the band: This is utterly pointless thing to discuss
Makes sense.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
Brett wrote:I've found parts of every album after Funeral to be enjoyable, but failing to engage on the whole, and this one is no different. Ultimately, I think disc one is more successful, and probably would have made a fine album on its own. The concert dress code thing goes along with this double album format to show that these guys definitely have some out-there ambitions, and are actively seeking to cultivate their artistic existence in a very specific fashion, but it's way too heavy-handed for me.

I don't have time to waste indulging something that doesn't reciprocate. I won't say that I'm done with this band, because they keep managing to string me along almost ten years after they were relevant to me, but I'm going to keep my interaction with the music at arm's length.
To be fair, during this tour you're not really seeing Arcade Fire, you're seeing 'The Reflektors', their concept-album concept-band. So you dress up as well. I'm sure it's just part of the fun for this particular album, and nothing to do with any future ambitions. They'll most probably go back to being Arcade Fire for the next one, with perfectly normal attire expected at gigs.
look, this is still pretentious hipster douchiness. that's just the justification for it
I think that someone who hates the album itself for its 'hipster douchiness' is already biased against anything else furthering the concept.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
Strat wrote:How is humiliating a person dying for attention and flashing her tits at a show even remotely pretentious or in the same league as making your audience show up in specific well dressed attire?
Making fun of the size of a girl's breasts is several dozen notches above implementing a dress code for your show in the asshole scale.

absolutely! but it is NOT pretentious.


I see strat had this covered.
You want to read my post on that, because whatever else it was, it was pretentious also.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by surfndestroy »

I could imagine this being a reasonable request if they were playing small, intimate venues. If it were done in a "We're playing small venues as a thank you to our fans and would like to make these fun celebrations with everyone dressing up to make a celebratory night even more special. We'll see you again in the fall when we play larger venues." kind of way it would be cool. But when you're playing arenas, it just comes across as pretentious.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by harmless »

'Pretentious' can join 'cringe' in that list of banned RM words now, surely.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by surfndestroy »

harmless wrote:'Pretentious' can join 'cringe' in that list of banned RM words now, surely.
Cringe worthy, hearing Ed talk politics between songs when drunk.

Pretentious, see Arcade Fire's dress code.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by harmless »

I know what pretentious means.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Harry Lime »

I was about fed up with the word "pretentious" after The Tree of Life.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by dimejinky99 »

Wow. Tide turned pretty quickly on the Fire eh?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Harry Lime »

No, people are just in bad moods. It's not AF's fault that we're in a recession. Dicks.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46234
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by BurtReynolds »

More and more I tend to view pretentiousness as a virtue.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by Harry Lime »

Yeah. I think anytime someone tries to tackle the subject of God, they're considered pretentious. I don't know why.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Arcade Fire

Post by harmless »

Harry Lime wrote:Yeah. I think anytime someone tries to tackle the subject of God, they're considered pretentious. I don't know why.
Because he's invisible?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Post Reply