Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Mon July 20, 2020 4:53 pm
by Jorge
Bi_3 wrote:Last message deleted. This was a spiteful and meaningless discussion that did nothing but emit negativity. Apologies for my part in it. Taking a few days off.
You keep self-canceling
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Mon July 20, 2020 5:39 pm
by Bi_3
Jorge wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Last message deleted. This was a spiteful and meaningless discussion that did nothing but emit negativity. Apologies for my part in it. Taking a few days off.
You keep self-canceling
I'm trying to check myself before you have to do it.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Mon July 20, 2020 5:58 pm
by Rob
We're here to check each other, amigo.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri July 24, 2020 8:56 pm
by BurtReynolds
.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri July 24, 2020 10:06 pm
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:Modern life distilled to its very essence:
"However, they remain a minority in senior management."
It sounds like they are firing people partially based on their ethnicity/ gender. Any chance those let go could prevail in a lawsuit on this basis?
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Fri July 24, 2020 10:21 pm
by BurtReynolds
.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Tue August 11, 2020 9:22 pm
by surfndestroy
‘Botanical Sexism’ could be why your allergies keep getting worse.
C’mon, if he’s going to address botanical sexism he should start with the entrenched botanical sexism in the marijuana industry. The misandry present in near female only plant growth should disgust you.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Wed August 12, 2020 1:10 am
by Mickey
surfndestroy wrote:
Mickey wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:‘Botanical Sexism’ could be why your allergies keep getting worse.
C’mon, if he’s going to address botanical sexism he should start with the entrenched botanical sexism in the marijuana industry. The misandry present in near female only plant growth should disgust you.
Like I said, the phrasing of "botanical sexism" is silly but the (relatively needless) preference for male trees in urban planning directly correlates to documented rise in allergen counts, so it is a real thing, and I would be careful of the knee-jerk response that's unable to separate the silly phrasing from real information.
Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Thu August 13, 2020 10:33 pm
by 96583UP
oops
Yale Discriminated by Race in Undergraduate Admissions, Justice Department Says
Federal officials give university two weeks to agree to adjust practices or face lawsuit after probe finds white, Asian-American applicants rejected based on race
[...]
The department said Thursday that it found Yale discriminates based on race and national origin, violating federal civil-rights law, and that race was the “determinative factor” in hundreds of admissions decisions each year. It said for the majority of applicants, Asian-American and white students have one-tenth to one-fourth the likelihood of being admitted as African-American applicants with comparable academic credentials.
