Red Mosquito

96583UP wrote:looking forward to when the outlier Dem candidates are no longer on the debate stage.

when do they up the cutoff requirements?

BurtReynolds wrote:

96583UP wrote:looking forward to when the outlier Dem candidates are no longer on the debate stage.

when do they up the cutoff requirements?

The only cutoff I want to see are the cut off heads of the leading establishment candidates displayed on pikes outside the charred ruins of DNC headquarters.

#yanggang2020

Bi_3 wrote:

“My point is that even as we push the envelope and we are bold in our vision, we also have to be rooted in reality and the fact that voters, including Democratic voters and certainly persuadable independents or even moderate Republicans, are not driven by the same views that are reflected on certain, you know, left-leaning Twitter feeds or the activist wing of our party.”

Obama gets it

“Voters, including Democrats, are not driven by the same views that are reflected on certain left-leaning Twitter feeds, or the activist wing of our party,” he warned. “And that’s not a criticism to the activist wing — their job is to poke and prod and text and inspire and motivate. But the candidate’s job, whoever that ends up being, is to get elected.”

It’s a vision that clashes with some on his party’s left, most obviously including supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And while he dismissed the debate between persuading voters and energizing base Democrats as “a false division,” he explained that he’d been thinking about how the candidates have been talking about him on the trail. “I think it is important for candidates to push past what I was able to achieve as president. I wouldn’t run the same campaign today, in this environment, as I ran in 2008, in part because we made enough progress since 2008, of which I am very proud, that it moved what’s possible. So I don’t want people to just revert to what’s safe, I want them to push out and try more, alright? So we got the Affordable Care Act. It was a really good starter home, as I say,” he said. “I don’t want people just standing pat, because we still have millions of people who are uninsured.”

“I don’t take it as a criticism when people say, ‘Hey, that’s great Obama did what he did, and now we want to do more.’ I hope so. That’s the whole point,” he said. “I think it is very important to all the candidates who are running, at every level, to pay some attention to where voters actually are, and how they think about their lives. And I don’t think we should be deluded into thinking that the resistance to certain approaches to things is simply because voters haven’t heard a bold enough proposal, and as soon as they hear a bold enough proposal that’s going to activate them. Because you know what? It turns out people are cautious, because they don’t have a margin for error.”

It didn’t occur to you to suggest a party dedicated to smaller govt and vigorous protection of individual liberty. Weird.

bune wrote:

It didn’t occur to you to suggest a party dedicated to smaller govt and vigorous protection of individual liberty. Weird.

How would a small gov't vigorously protect individual liberties? I want to understand and not mock what appear to be contradictory statements.

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:...and because of The sweeping liberalization of suburban women…a group that wants LGBTQ and women’s rights protections, and a rejection of racism.

surfndestroy wrote:

McParadigm wrote:...and because of The sweeping liberalization of suburban women…a group that wants LGBTQ and women’s rights protections, and a rejection of racism.

Are you so sure about the BTQ part of LGBTQ?