Page 58 of 169

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri December 20, 2013 3:08 pm
by hlniv
broken iris wrote:Is this the worst non-Broken Iris thread on RM?
It's the only hlniv thread on RM. So, yes, by definition, it must be worse

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 1:19 am
by LuNY
BurtReynolds wrote:
PryTo wrote:
guitar_davey wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Ten was the album that hooked me, but I didn't hear it until sometime between Vitalogy and No Code ( I lived in the sticks). No Code was the first album I bought and was hooked. Then I bought Ten and spent several months playing it on repeat. Then I bought Vs and Vitalogy and Merkinball on the same day. By the time Yield came out, I was a pretty big fan. Didn't like Binaural at first, but didn't hate it. I hated Riot Act. Gave a pirated copy 2 listens and promptly deleted it from my hard drive and swore off PJ.

Oddly enough, hearing WWS on the radio got me back into them, even though I thought (and still think) WWS was a terrible song. It did get me to give Binaural and RA another try, and I'm glad it did. Their live shows are what really got me hooked again at this point, as their studio output was steadily dropping.

Just curious, and definitely not looking to argue, but what makes WWS a "terrible song" to your ears?
Mind if I take that one? IMO, the chorus is grating, the music is non-distinct and try hard, and the lyrics are hit-you-over-the-head obvious. The lyrics have no subtlety or vivid images -- they sound like high-school poetry (combined with juvenile analysis: "War = bad"). Compare these to "Dissident," which you really have to interpret and spend some time with. Huge change. I think about half of Avocado is decent. WWS is probably my least favorite song on it, although it has competition.
My intro to WWS was an odd one. I'm not kidding, I had totally stopped following PJ. For all I knew, they broke up. One day at a friend's place it came on some shitty alt-rock radio station.

At first, I was struck that it didn't sound like every other piece of shit song being played by Nickelback or Hinder or whoever, so at least it had that going for it. I didn't realize it was PJ at first. If I had to guess who it was , I'd say something like Sammy Hagar or something (I wasn't far off). It just has that mid tempo, DADROCK ADULT CONTEMPORARY SOUND. It wasn't until the chorus that I realized it was Ed.

Musically, it just kinda limps into existence and then keeps farting along with none of the fury that seems present in the lyrics (or title). Its weird that a scathing assault on war named Worldwide Suicide sounds like something you'd hear while gorging on Chicken Crispers at Chili's. Even Ed sounds weezy. Actually, it sounds like his voice is literally slowed down. Its weird. If its not meant to be a rocker, then it could at least have some rhythm or groove, but its too starchy to manage that. It sort of comes to life around the 2:30 mark, and I'm being very generous, but in the end its a lifeless piece of shit.

Needless to say, I didn't mention to my friends that it was Pearl Jam or that I was a lapsed fan, and they didn't even seem to notice the song at all. It did get me curious about what Pearl Jam was up to.

I would have to say its a Sammy Hagar Weekend


Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 1:52 am
by BurtReynolds
do you just randomly search threads, or is there a method to your madness?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 6:38 am
by 96583UP
oh god

this thread is back

hold on to your wallets

gonna get lazery up in this mofo

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 6:51 am
by hlniv
Image

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 2:54 pm
by Norah
take it to the human bass dirty talk thread

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 7:18 pm
by hlniv
cutuphalfdead wrote:take it to the human bass dirty talk thread
I am oddly interested to find out what "human bass dirty talk" really is. Sounds kinky.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 8:11 pm
by Alex
the thing about this thread is... if pearl jam were moneygrabbing post riot act, wouldn't it be done with songs that, like, sound good, at all? this is their blandest phase. or is that the point and i'm just missing the joke?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 8:31 pm
by hlniv
Alex wrote:the thing about this thread is... if pearl jam were moneygrabbing post riot act, wouldn't it be done with songs that, like, sound good, at all? this is their blandest phase. or is that the point and i'm just missing the joke?
Image

I really hate to drag this back out... but hey... screw it

The new material is not the prime Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ vehicle. It's all the other shit. Celebratory shows, licensing, the Oracle thing, the Target thing, etc... Now, there are arguments to be made against this type of basis for the Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ theory, but the Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ theory is not just about writing and releasing tunes. The argument for the songs themselves as being a part of the Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ theory is that they are written specifically to attract or retain an audience that has money to spend, and not specifically written to satisfy their own artistic expression.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 8:37 pm
by harmless
There's also giving hundreds of your songs to the baseball World Series.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 9:01 pm
by dimejinky99
Pearl jam have officially sold out the San Siro stadium in Milan.
Now we're on a different level.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 9:24 pm
by stip
There are not words for how much I hate this stupid thread

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 9:58 pm
by McParadigm
Maybe if it was LAL the Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 10:03 pm
by BurtReynolds
The Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ theory is solid. The Post-Riot Act Moneygrab™ theory is sound!

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Thu February 13, 2014 10:17 pm
by stip
McParadigm wrote:Maybe if it was LAL the Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Do we need a Lets Actually Read series?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri February 14, 2014 1:40 am
by hlniv
stip wrote:There are not words for how much I hate this stupid thread
And that's how we know its gold.

It's moneygrab gold

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri February 14, 2014 2:37 am
by 96583UP
harmless wrote:There's also giving hundreds of your songs to the baseball World Series.
and a Rupert Murdoch world series at that

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri February 14, 2014 2:43 am
by 96583UP
Alex wrote:the thing about this thread is... if pearl jam were moneygrabbing post riot act, wouldn't it be done with songs that, like, sound good, at all? this is their blandest phase. or is that the point and i'm just missing the joke?
part of increasing revenue is the volume game

the volume game is driven by the masses

and the masses are stupid

the masses like it bland. bland like mcdonald's and network cop dramas.

you can't make it too fancy, it confuses them (e.g. the Arch Deluxe)

The McMoneygrab™ is back!!!!!

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri February 14, 2014 2:36 pm
by hlniv
Image

Stole this from another thread. Don't think it's been placed here, which should be its true home.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Fri February 14, 2014 2:40 pm
by broken iris
96583UP wrote: The McMoneygrab™ is back!!!!!
Image