Page 58 of 277
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Tue May 31, 2016 8:04 pm
by LoathedVermin72
spike wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I wouldn't put too much stock in it. Just sounds like bullshit rumor mill stuff to me. All that hoopla over the Suicide Squad reshoots turned out to be misleading nonsense.
You totally freaked out over that.
I sure did. I believed the narrative. Like an idiot.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Tue May 31, 2016 11:03 pm
by B
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, take this 3rd grade crap somewhere else. kthnx
Are you talking about the poetry, or Star Wars in general?
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Tue May 31, 2016 11:57 pm
by stip
apparently there was a script writer brought in to work on this script a while ago (but after it started shooting). so this sounds like it may have been troubled for a bit. I wonder if that's why we've gotten so little marketing for it
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 12:08 am
by Strat
Apparently han solo is brought back to life in Rogue One so he can appear through a warped timeline storyline of Episode 8
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 12:13 am
by @SkitchP
Strat wrote:Apparently han solo is brought back to life in Rogue One so he can appear through a warped timeline storyline of Episode 8
And apparently there is a montage devoted to explaining the circumstances that leads to the Sarlacc proofing of Mandolorian armor.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:21 am
by stip
this is going to be great!
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:24 am
by Strat
LoathedVermin72 wrote:that was pretty outstanding
Thank you for this, by the way. Nobody else gave me the respect.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 12:09 pm
by epilogue
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:19 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Well, they said exactly the same thing about Suicide Squad, and David Ayer later called it out as bullshit. But, then again, Disney is Satan incarnate, so I wouldn't be shocked.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:20 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
That article is based on Page 6's report though.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:23 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I will say that if it is true (of which I'm skeptical), then Disney execs are liars, idiots, cowards, or all three, since:
A) Edwards has said from day one this was going to be a grim, dark war movie that was far removed from other SW, and also said he was encouraged by execs to go there.
B) None of Edwards's other movies are at all "light" in tone.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:45 pm
by epilogue
moot post given the next post
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:51 pm
by epilogue
So I know a guy on the inside....
Here's what he's said. Now, he's not involved with this film in any way. But he's in the industry and has many many friends who are working on this (and other SW films). He's just passing on what his friend told him.
Okay, I heard from someone today and this thing is being totally blown out of proportion.
Pickup shots were already scheduled but Disney's biggest issue (not LucasFilm but Disney) was that there's currently not enough Vader.
I think everyone wants to see Vader get as much screen time as possible so this isn't a bad thing but from Disney's perspective, it's all about merch and toys.
The Vader of R1 looks like Rebels and ANH, making it somewhat unique on the market.
Take it FWIW.
His sources aren't always as truthful as they wish they could be and sometimes they are flat out wrong. But this does seem a bit encouraging and speaks to what LV said above. Most importantly, it make Page 6 and festering asshole again, which restores true hope and balance to my universe.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 1:53 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Reshoots to rework a blockbuster's tone are common, and this is probably getting sensationalized because it's a Star Wars movie so it's being watched much more closely by the press than other blockbusters.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 2:10 pm
by epilogue
Exactly. But then CoS got me all worked up. And I forgot the face of my father.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 4:04 pm
by McParadigm
It'll all make sense after the Wicket standalone I'm sure.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 4:25 pm
by epilogue
I want a really somber, old school, Italian-style silent film about the hardships of being a Jawa. I want to see a downtrodden Jawa come home from a long 18 hour day of backbreaking labor, sit alone at his small, slightly rusted, table and drink 5 fingers of bad whiskey and cry as he masturbates to Gungan porn.
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 4:26 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:I want a really somber, old school, Italian-style silent film about the hardships of being a Jawa. I want to see a downtrodden Jawa come home from a long 18 hour day of backbreaking labor, sit alone at his small, slightly rusted, table and drink 5 fingers of bad whiskey cry as he masturbates to Gungan porn.
THAT'S NOT MY STAR WARS
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 4:29 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I want a really somber, old school, Italian-style silent film about the hardships of being a Jawa. I want to see a downtrodden Jawa come home from a long 18 hour day of backbreaking labor, sit alone at his small, slightly rusted, table and drink 5 fingers of bad whiskey cry as he masturbates to Gungan porn.
THAT'S NOT MY STAR WARS
Why do you think that sentiment is so bothersome to you coming from Star Wars fans but not Star Trek fans?
Re: Star Wars: Rogue One
Posted: Wed June 01, 2016 4:30 pm
by Strat
Thats my kind of star wars for sure. Especially he porn and whiskey