Red Mosquito

durdencommatyler wrote:I watched 'Who Took Johnny?'

I liked it a lot. I'd highly recommend it.

bart wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I watched 'Who Took Johnny?'

I liked it a lot. I'd highly recommend it.

It was interesting, but extremely dishonest. I understand there are probably libel concerns, but it really downplays the mother's mental instability and the craziness of the allegations around the credit union. It also felt like they were playing up the initial conflict with local authorities to try and capitalize on the success of Making a Murderer.

Rangi Guy wrote:Gone Baby Gone

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Rangi Guy wrote:Gone Baby Gone

Ugh

bart wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I watched 'Who Took Johnny?'

I liked it a lot. I'd highly recommend it.

It was interesting, but extremely dishonest. I understand there are probably libel concerns, but it really downplays the mother's mental instability and the craziness of the allegations around the credit union. It also felt like they were playing up the initial conflict with local authorities to try and capitalize on the success of Making a Murderer.

bart wrote:Oh yeah, 2014. Well then.

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

durdencommatyler wrote:

bart wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I watched 'Who Took Johnny?'

I liked it a lot. I'd highly recommend it.

It was interesting, but extremely dishonest. I understand there are probably libel concerns, but it really downplays the mother's mental instability and the craziness of the allegations around the credit union. It also felt like they were playing up the initial conflict with local authorities to try and capitalize on the success of Making a Murderer.

I didn't get that sense at all.

And you're going to have to point me toward your evidence in favor of the Credit Union.

I thought they did a good job discrediting Noreen. Or at least planting suspicion as far as she goes.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Jean-Francois Richet's Assault on Precinct 13 remake. Now that is one perfect fucking genre movie.

bart wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

bart wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I watched 'Who Took Johnny?'

I liked it a lot. I'd highly recommend it.

It was interesting, but extremely dishonest. I understand there are probably libel concerns, but it really downplays the mother's mental instability and the craziness of the allegations around the credit union. It also felt like they were playing up the initial conflict with local authorities to try and capitalize on the success of Making a Murderer.

I didn't get that sense at all.

And you're going to have to point me toward your evidence in favor of the Credit Union.

I thought they did a good job discrediting Noreen. Or at least planting suspicion as far as she goes.

What she actually thinks is that the pedo ring was run as part of George Bush's new world order, with some random satanist stuff in there as well. You don't need to plant suspicion, she's obviously fucking nuts. They purposefully did not include the most crazy stuff she says.