Red Mosquito

stip wrote:Because it was a commercial, not a contract.

Take it to extremes for a moment.

Imagine that the trailer had consisted ONLY of scenes that weren't in the movie. Would this be enough to justify anger?

Imagine that the trailer had featured a popular, highly recognizable character who wasn't in the movie at all. Would this make it false advertising? If Darth Vader never shows up in Rogue One, won't some people be tricked out of money and time they might otherwise not have spent?

There's a level at which everybody can agree that an advertisement was manipulatively misleading. It's the question of where the line actually is that gets tricky.

Although if you're willingly paying hard earned money to see Suicide Squad, then I'm pretty sure you've just been screwed over by life and genetics in general.

if Woody had gone straight to the reviews none of this would have happened.

The worst line in the movie is

Spoiler: show

I already lost one family, I'm not about to lose another one!

I think every one of those awful lines were written in the re shoots...Like Killer Croc saying im beautiful.

So Harley's shorts were digitally shortened in post?

Gross.

durdencommatyler wrote:So Harley's shorts were digitally shortened in post?

Gross.

Source?

I don't buy it. The behind-the-scenes photos and B-roll footage show shorts that are exactly as short as they are in the movie.

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:So Harley's shorts were digitally shortened in post?

Gross.

Source?

I heard it on a podcast.

Then I took to the ol' Google machine. It seems that if anything they were actually LENGTHENED in post. Phew!

well thank god her modesty was protected

Imagine all those feminists right?

It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

I am perfectly calm, friend.

And I already said it didn't happen. What I'm asking is if you would have a problem with it if it ever did happen.

In the " what if" world, i guess it would be weird...and im not sure they can do it anyway.

I mean there are contracts, etc.

There you go.

durdencommatyler wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

I am perfectly calm, friend.

And I already said it didn't happen. What I'm asking is if you would have a problem with it if it ever did happen.

what if a movie trailer advertised characters or scenes that were not in the movie? Are you ok with that?

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

I am perfectly calm, friend.

And I already said it didn't happen. What I'm asking is if you would have a problem with it if it ever did happen.

what if a movie trailer advertised characters or scenes that were not in the movie? Are you ok with that?

Yes. 100%. It happens all the goddamn time, Burt.

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

I am perfectly calm, friend.

And I already said it didn't happen. What I'm asking is if you would have a problem with it if it ever did happen.

what if a movie trailer advertised characters or scenes that were not in the movie? Are you ok with that?

Yes. 100%. It happens all the goddamn time, Burt.

not in my America

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:It doesn't seem to have happened here. But if it had, are you okay with that?

Seriously, no shtick, all joking aside. Are you okay with digitally removing an actor's, any actor, male or female, clothing in post production? Especially if the actor had no idea that was going to happen?

But that didnt happened Joey. Calm down.

I am perfectly calm, friend.

And I already said it didn't happen. What I'm asking is if you would have a problem with it if it ever did happen.

what if a movie trailer advertised characters or scenes that were not in the movie? Are you ok with that?

Yes. 100%. It happens all the goddamn time, Burt.

not in my America

What else isn't allowed in your America, Burt?