Re: MLB
Posted: Tue June 09, 2020 4:00 am
And bring back Frank Thomas and Griffey Jr. to resume their home run record chase.

Bammer wrote:Any gifs of Wade Boggs crushing 36 beers on one flight?

They're the worst.Electromatic wrote:It’s pretty clear the owners would rather not have a season.
and union-buster olney has been an owner apologist throughout this whole ordeal.philpritchard wrote:They're the worst.Electromatic wrote:It’s pretty clear the owners would rather not have a season.
cutuphalfdead wrote:And let Tony Gwynn try for .400!
It's pretty hard to find a prominent baseball "journalist" that isnt a PR guy for the owners.Chris_H_2 wrote:and union-buster olney has been an owner apologist throughout this whole ordeal.philpritchard wrote:They're the worst.Electromatic wrote:It’s pretty clear the owners would rather not have a season.
Electromatic wrote:The owners don’t want a season.
Just sell the damn teams.
If baseball is so unprofitable, sell the damn teams.
Manfred is a stooge.
Boo freakin' hoo.blueviper wrote:Electromatic wrote:The owners don’t want a season.
Just sell the damn teams.
If baseball is so unprofitable, sell the damn teams.
Manfred is a stooge.
The sports talk station here in St. Louis was discussing the profit thing for major league baseball franchises. They had found some numbers (don't know where) and had talked to the President of Baseball Operations for the Cards, John Mozeliak. It was stated that the profit margins owners typically see are around 15%. That is small potatoes compared to other business dealings that can usually net a profit in the 30-50% range.
Mo' stated that they don't own baseball teams to be profitable. They are usually a long term investment. You are building the value of the team and that is the pay off in the end if you ever decide to sell or whatever.
It sounds like an interesting set up. Whether these numbers are true or not remains to be seen, and whether or not owners see larger profit than 15% is unknown as well since they don't discuss their numbers.
I dont think the AT exemption is much of a concern for them, a few timely donations will solve that problem.Chris_H_2 wrote:don't forget the antitrust exemption for congress. opening their books may prove difficult to convince people that baseball is not "commerce," but merely recreational.
if 1994 is any indication, they should be thinking about it as we enter a perfect storm after the cba expires.numbers wrote:I dont think the AT exemption is much of a concern for them, a few timely donations will solve that problem.Chris_H_2 wrote:don't forget the antitrust exemption for congress. opening their books may prove difficult to convince people that baseball is not "commerce," but merely recreational.