Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Posted: Wed January 09, 2013 9:19 pm
Ryan Fitzpatrick another casualty
Yeah, I probably should have added him. I didn't think about it because the Bills aren't in horrible cap shape, but then again I added Cassel and Jackson even though the Chiefs are also fine under the cap.Mecca wrote:Ryan Fitzpatrick another casualty
Yeah, when i first heard about this stuff i thought it was just more raiders drama and thought he might be a nice pick up for the bucs, but this dude just seems to be on a downward spiral and needs to get himself straightened upElectromatic wrote:I think Rolando McClain got arrested again yesterday...
I really wanted him to fall to Miami in that draft.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Yeah, when i first heard about this stuff i thought it was just more raiders drama and thought he might be a nice pick up for the bucs, but this dude just seems to be on a downward spiral and needs to get himself straightened upElectromatic wrote:I think Rolando McClain got arrested again yesterday...
Did you not like the Chudzinski hire?Joesanity wrote:I. Hate. The. Browns.
It's just so...meh. And if the rumor of a switch on the defense from a 4-3 to a 3-4 happens then they're really screwing up what was one of the strong points of this team.Green Habit wrote:Did you not like the Chudzinski hire?Joesanity wrote:I. Hate. The. Browns.
Yeah, I don't know why they didn't start doing that sooner. RG is a good pocket passer.darth_vedder wrote:Looks like Washington's savior is out for quite some time. It looks doubtful that he'll be ready before October, so I hope Captain Kirk is ready. I wonder if the team will scrap the read option and go to more traditional west coast offense with Cousins taking over? Even if RG can come back at 90%, I hope they take out some running plays and don't expose the guy so much. If not, I'm thinking he'll have a very, very short NFL career.
Totally. The guy can chunk it 60 years effortlessly. The read-option is neat, but RG won't be around long if we keep relying on him to run so much. Hopefully when he comes back the only running he'll do is when the pocket collapses. If he takes off then, cool, but all of these designed run plays are going to end the guy's career soon.EJ wrote:Yeah, I don't know why they didn't start doing that sooner. RG is a good pocket passer.darth_vedder wrote:Looks like Washington's savior is out for quite some time. It looks doubtful that he'll be ready before October, so I hope Captain Kirk is ready. I wonder if the team will scrap the read option and go to more traditional west coast offense with Cousins taking over? Even if RG can come back at 90%, I hope they take out some running plays and don't expose the guy so much. If not, I'm thinking he'll have a very, very short NFL career.
Who knew our chud was a polack?@SkitchP wrote:My biggest fear is that now that he has the Browns job is that he doesn't post as much
It really makes me think Rolando McClain is not such a bad guy.Electromatic wrote:Wait, Chris Rainey beats his girlfriend????
Who could have foreseen this????
I agree with you on the defensive front switch, but having suffered through the McDaniels period, I know that the sexy hire isn't always the best one.Joesanity wrote:It's just so...meh. And if the rumor of a switch on the defense from a 4-3 to a 3-4 happens then they're really screwing up what was one of the strong points of this team.Green Habit wrote:Did you not like the Chudzinski hire?Joesanity wrote:I. Hate. The. Browns.
Him and Zimmer were the hot coordinators last year and i was shocked neither got or took a job. I think Chudz is considered to have a real good offensive mind, and even though he was a TE coach, i think he is thought to be good with QBs so maybe they hope he can develop Weedon and build an offense around him. Might be a let down after Kelly went back to college and the rumors of Saban, but i think he will be a good hireGreen Habit wrote:Did you not like the Chudzinski hire?Joesanity wrote:I. Hate. The. Browns.
It's the defense more than anything. I don't want to sit through another draft where they waste time trying to find linebackers to fit a 3-4 (which they don't have now) instead of getting the one or two pieces to make this a really good defense. The foundation is there. I have a feeling they're going to screw it up in typical Browns fashion.Green Habit wrote:I agree with you on the defensive front switch, but having suffered through the McDaniels period, I know that the sexy hire isn't always the best one.Joesanity wrote:It's just so...meh. And if the rumor of a switch on the defense from a 4-3 to a 3-4 happens then they're really screwing up what was one of the strong points of this team.Green Habit wrote:Did you not like the Chudzinski hire?Joesanity wrote:I. Hate. The. Browns.