Page 7 of 11

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 8:22 am
by Heathen
dimejinky99 wrote:I wasn't aware that space rock had a definition. I was thinking more of a dark instrumental heavy record with lots of 8 minute long trippy songs. Like NAIS but more so.
one can dream

this kind of music just doesn't sell enough

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 8:23 am
by yofismom
That description is funny but I do think PJ has some great psychedelic potential. I'd love to see them develop in that direction.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:33 am
by dimejinky99
Are sales a consideration for this band anymore? They had a spike with the last two re odds I believe, they brought in a good amount of new fans, but I thought their sales were pretty set a certain number worldwide?

Either way it wouldn't hurt to try something slightly psychedelic. They have it in them, though it might be blighted by the punk rock leaning.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 10:11 am
by Heathen
I would say it looks like they care to have catchy music than can be played on the radio and sell relatively well. Dark and atmospheric doesn't go too well with that IMO but I'd love to be proven wrong.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 10:24 am
by dimejinky99
I'd agree but that zeitgeist seems to have shifted, on radio here at least. Lot of the new stuff by QOTSA and even the darker Daft Punk is getting played.
Maybe the mood has shifted with the taste makers? It's well time for it.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 10:36 am
by Heathen
dimejinky99 wrote:I'd agree but that zeitgeist seems to have shifted, on radio here at least. Lot of the new stuff by QOTSA and even the darker Daft Punk is getting played.
Maybe the mood has shifted with the taste makers? It's well time for it.
Those examples are just not what I would call dark, moody music. Look at pretty much any kind of charts. People want to dance and sing along.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 10:53 am
by WtOB?
WtOB? wrote:Heres one..
1. Severed Hand
2. World Wide Suicide
3. Marker In The Sand
4. Better Days
5. Amongst the Waves
6. Parachutes
7. Santa Cruz
8. Comatose
9. Unemployble
10. Gone (demo)
11. Army Reserve
12. Speed of Sound
13. Inside Job
14. The End
Actually gave this a listen, there's some real dynamics in there. The Better Days/Amongst The Waves/Parachutes threesome lovefest works pretty well too.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 10:56 am
by yofismom
dimejinky99 wrote:I'd agree but that zeitgeist seems to have shifted, on radio here at least. Lot of the new stuff by QOTSA and even the darker Daft Punk is getting played.
Maybe the mood has shifted with the taste makers? It's well time for it.
Psychedelic needn't be too dark (though I have nothing against dark). Grateful Dead are classic psychedelia & not generally too dark, at least often not.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 8:49 pm
by Norah
yofismom wrote:That description is funny but I do think PJ has some great psychedelic potential. I'd love to see them develop in that direction.
Sure they have the potential, but I don't think they'll ever have the balls to truly explore that potential. They even pussied out of Binaural.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:12 pm
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:
yofismom wrote:That description is funny but I do think PJ has some great psychedelic potential. I'd love to see them develop in that direction.
Sure they have the potential, but I don't think they'll ever have the balls to truly explore that potential. They even pussied out of Binaural.
And Jack Irons.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:14 pm
by harmless
An album is not 'maturer' just because it's written by a band full of older people. The last couple of albums have been fairly juvenile in several spots, whereas something like Vitalogy, No Code, Yield and Binaural are probably more intelligent than they ever intended. Riot Act is a bit overwrought and it marks the beginning of the 'try-too-hard' era, but man, it's far better than the last two in almost every way.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:17 pm
by epilogue
Riot Act is better than a large chunk of the Pearl Jam catalog, says I.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:19 pm
by tommymtcom
Yeah, Riot Act is excellent. To me it sounds like the last album that the band needed to make, if that makes sense.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:21 pm
by harmless
It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:29 pm
by epilogue
harmless wrote:It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.
You obviously don't understand anything about glorious maturity.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:30 pm
by Norah
tommymctom wrote:Yeah, Riot Act is excellent. To me it sounds like the last album that the band needed to make, if that makes sense.
Makes perfect sense.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:32 pm
by harmless
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.
You obviously don't understand anything about glorious maturity.
Absolutely nothing, I'll freely admit it.

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:34 pm
by epilogue
harmless wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.
You obviously don't understand anything about glorious maturity.
Absolutely nothing, I'll freely admit it.
Are those rumored tracks on the new Untitled/T.B.D/Ghost Rides Pearl Jam album?

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:44 pm
by harmless
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.
You obviously don't understand anything about glorious maturity.
Absolutely nothing, I'll freely admit it.
Are those rumored tracks on the new Untitled/T.B.D/Ghost Rides Pearl Jam album?
Absolutely Nothing (3:22), I'll Freely Admit It (4:12), Glorious Maturity (7:39)

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Posted: Sat June 08, 2013 9:46 pm
by epilogue
harmless wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
harmless wrote:It's the last timeless album they've made. S/T and Backspacer were both entertaining for a while. It would be good if the next album had something lasting about it. That's actually all I'll ask for this time around.
You obviously don't understand anything about glorious maturity.
Absolutely nothing, I'll freely admit it.
Are those rumored tracks on the new Untitled/T.B.D/Ghost Rides Pearl Jam album?
Absolutely Nothing (3:22), I'll Freely Admit It (4:12), Glorious Maturity (7:39)
The longer the song, the maturer it is. :thumbsup: