Re: The Official Led Zeppelin Thread
Posted: Wed June 04, 2014 4:24 pm
I said the same thing to him on Twitter. It's driving me bonkers.bada wrote:Skitch put those in the right order before I lose my mind. Post the pic for verification.
I said the same thing to him on Twitter. It's driving me bonkers.bada wrote:Skitch put those in the right order before I lose my mind. Post the pic for verification.
Not fans of Oreos?Simple Torture wrote:I said the same thing to him on Twitter. It's driving me bonkers.bada wrote:Skitch put those in the right order before I lose my mind. Post the pic for verification.
You should see his fucking Facebook profile picture.Simple Torture wrote:I said the same thing to him on Twitter. It's driving me bonkers.bada wrote:Skitch put those in the right order before I lose my mind. Post the pic for verification.
Yeah, that thing annoys me. Fortunately he rarely does anything on FB.theplatypus wrote:You should see his fucking Facebook profile picture.Simple Torture wrote:I said the same thing to him on Twitter. It's driving me bonkers.bada wrote:Skitch put those in the right order before I lose my mind. Post the pic for verification.
Personally, I'd be more impressed that she even knew that that was a Zeppelin songLoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys, I asked my wife what her favorite Led Zeppelin song is and she said "The Crunge." What the fuck is that shit?
You can shake your ass to it.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You guys, I asked my wife what her favorite Led Zeppelin song is and she said "The Crunge." What the fuck is that shit?
They remastered the whole catalog. It's on iTunes and some French site in lossless. The deluxe sets are coming out in 3 groups of 3.zeb wrote:So are there going to be more of these remasters?
Thanks WCT!Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:They remastered the whole catalog. It's on iTunes and some French site in lossless. The deluxe sets are coming out in 3 groups of 3.zeb wrote:So are there going to be more of these remasters?
I expected worse on the live concert...but I recall reading that there wasn't any soundboard recording of that show so Pagey had to work from a few different sources.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think what they are doing is - the albums proper will come with an "alternate" version of the album - the actual finished unreleased songs are being saved for the Coda deluxe - and when they don't have enough outtakes (such as the first album) they are going to include live material and shit like that. I think the live concert on the first set sounds like garbage - I can't believe Jimmy Page released it - others disagree.
The concert makes me realize how far they came between that October 10, 1969 show and the Royal Albert Hall show on the dvd a mere three months later January 9, 1970. On the new remaster, it is the blues covers that work best. John Paul Jones is a beast. As for the sound, I think for what was recorded for fm radio 45 years ago that it's pretty amazing.hbk wrote:I expected worse on the live concert...but I recall reading that there wasn't any soundboard recording of that show so Pagey had to work from a few different sources.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think what they are doing is - the albums proper will come with an "alternate" version of the album - the actual finished unreleased songs are being saved for the Coda deluxe - and when they don't have enough outtakes (such as the first album) they are going to include live material and shit like that. I think the live concert on the first set sounds like garbage - I can't believe Jimmy Page released it - others disagree.
Also Page mentioned that the only live recording in the remasters was that Paris show for LZ1.
I'm digging the hell out of the remasters. On par with the remastered Beatles albums from a few years back if you ask me, but I'm no audio expert. The songs sound much better than the 94 remasters.
I didn't realize the show was from 10/10, has anyone listened to the Pre-FM source currently circulating to see if it is any better?surfndestroy wrote:The concert makes me realize how far they came between that October 10, 1969 show and the Royal Albert Hall show on the dvd a mere three months later January 9, 1970. On the new remaster, it is the blues covers that work best. John Paul Jones is a beast. As for the sound, I think for what was recorded for fm radio 45 years ago that it's pretty amazing.hbk wrote:I expected worse on the live concert...but I recall reading that there wasn't any soundboard recording of that show so Pagey had to work from a few different sources.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think what they are doing is - the albums proper will come with an "alternate" version of the album - the actual finished unreleased songs are being saved for the Coda deluxe - and when they don't have enough outtakes (such as the first album) they are going to include live material and shit like that. I think the live concert on the first set sounds like garbage - I can't believe Jimmy Page released it - others disagree.
Also Page mentioned that the only live recording in the remasters was that Paris show for LZ1.
I'm digging the hell out of the remasters. On par with the remastered Beatles albums from a few years back if you ask me, but I'm no audio expert. The songs sound much better than the 94 remasters.
The rough mixes on II and III just make me appreciate Jimmy Page more as a producer. III is the more interesting of the two. Hearing some of the songs without vocals does let you have more appreciation for the musicianship the band had. I love the band and have come away liking them even more and appreciating them more.