Re: The Beatles
Posted: Fri January 18, 2013 12:52 am
surface the north wrote:Save your money, friend. There are poor people in Houston.
You just made me panic a little bit ;l
surface the north wrote:Save your money, friend. There are poor people in Houston.
darth_vedder wrote:^McParadigm wrote:I didn't really think much about the earlier records until I started getting really into late-50's early-60's pop, blues, skiffle, and 'rock' music. The clearer a picture I had of what the landscape was when they came out, the more impressed I was with the band from day one.
I really like early, all-in-one-take rock and soul music. Almost all of it is imperfect....stumbly and swinging, you know, and that's a huge plus to my ears. The limitations of two track recording and the simplicity of the subject matter pre-mid 60's aren't so much a weakness as they are a different shade of a known quality...pre-rebellion punk design, recorded in big rooms by engineers in lab coats. Not only that, but with music growing so thoroughly entrenched in minor key songwriting the last few decades, I find I really dig those major key-heavy 60's pop records more and more. I wish I could play them all on 45. I really do.
Having said all that, the Beatles were actually tighter performers than most other bands that came out of the era. All records from that era lean a bit on the sloppy side ("Okay, everybody get it right this time, because we have to record six more songs today"), but The Beatles really did a remarkable job (the remasters really reveal this). Especially....strangely enough....Ringo. There are literally just a small handful of times in all their recording sessions where a song has to be restarted because Ringo screwed up. Go figure.
These days, I honestly think I listen to Please Please Me, Hard Day's Night, Beatles for Sale, and Help more than I do Revolver or Sgt. Pepper. Those other records are incredibly cool, yeah, and I've worn them out, but I find a lot of fresh air in the pre-"We're gonna change the world, oh I guess not" days. Naivety and joy are table wines. Pour yourself a glass and enjoy the sunset.
That pretty much says it all regarding my opinion of pre-Rubber Soul Beatles.
I tweeted this today after I read your post. I love it. So... thanks for posting it.McParadigm wrote:Naivety and joy are table wines.
are you gay?Strat wrote:surface the north wrote:Your rampant spending on vinyl is starting to drive me up the wall, Strat.
Hey man. Im a full time employee, 31 years old and single...wtf else am i going to do?
There are some amazing songs on those albums.Will wrote:I kind of like the obscure deep cuts from just before they went psychedelic with Revolver and Sgt. Pepper. Shit from Rubber Soul, Beatles For Sale, A Hard Days Night. There's some fantastic songs that never get the attention they deserve from casual fans who only know bigger numbers.
Just give him the fucking money, strat. Just give it to him.Strat wrote:surface the north wrote:Your rampant spending on vinyl is starting to drive me up the wall, Strat.
Hey man. Im a full time employee, 31 years old and single...wtf else am i going to do?
I just love the feel of the album as a whole, id probably rank a lot of the songs a little lower then others(kinda like with rubber soul for me) but the overall album works for meNancyBabich wrote:Of the great albums Sgt Peppers is easily the weakest.
There really are. It's kind of amazing. The 1's album is really kind of awful when you look at it from this perspective.Birds in Hell wrote:There are some amazing songs on those albums.Will wrote:I kind of like the obscure deep cuts from just before they went psychedelic with Revolver and Sgt. Pepper. Shit from Rubber Soul, Beatles For Sale, A Hard Days Night. There's some fantastic songs that never get the attention they deserve from casual fans who only know bigger numbers.