warehouse wrote:can we get a vid of lbc/jumpin jack flash? am i the only person who cares about this?
thats a safe bet.
There is no tag that could make that song enjoyable.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 8:35 pm
by bodysnatcher
broken iris wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
warehouse wrote:can we get a vid of lbc/jumpin jack flash? am i the only person who cares about this?
thats a safe bet.
There is no tag that could make that song enjoyable.
what if they tagged LBC with a snippet of LBC? two wrongs make a right?
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 8:52 pm
by warehouse
broken iris wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
warehouse wrote:can we get a vid of lbc/jumpin jack flash? am i the only person who cares about this?
thats a safe bet.
There is no tag that could make that song enjoyable.
what if mick jager strutted out and started pointing around and puckering his lips? that would at least be funny.
i always dig when bands do something new to old songs.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 9:41 pm
by broken iris
warehouse wrote:
broken iris wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
warehouse wrote:can we get a vid of lbc/jumpin jack flash? am i the only person who cares about this?
thats a safe bet.
There is no tag that could make that song enjoyable.
what if mick jager strutted out and started pointing around and puckering his lips? that would at least be funny.
i always dig when bands do something new to old songs.
I love twists on the familiar tracks, but LBC is like a song by a Pearl Jam parody artist that they cover ironically.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 10:03 pm
by Will
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 10:16 pm
by Birds in Hell
Sounds great.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 10:43 pm
by bodysnatcher
Birds in Hell wrote:Sounds great.
Yeah, I actually really enjoyed that performance, and I thoroughly dislike that song in general. There were many points in the song where Ed normally would have done his present-day warble, but he didn't. He didn't try and strain to hit notes, and instead changed a melody. Kinda promising.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 11:50 pm
by stip
Will wrote:
wow, that jam has almost redeemed LBC for me. that was great.
They always look like they have a lot of fun playing together. I wish they'd record a record on the road.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 11:58 pm
by warehouse
thank will, that was great! im also pretty sure that rearrangement/tag was influenced by mike mccready's friendship with stefan lessard of dave matthews band. now all we need is a sax player in pearl jam.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Fri October 03, 2014 11:59 pm
by warehouse
also, more stones covers.
or just new covers in general.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 12:30 am
by CopperTom
warehouse wrote:also, more stones covers.
or just new covers in general.
They really did nail Ain't Talkin' 'Bout Love last year. I would like that one played more. Every other one played less.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 12:35 am
by LetMeSleep
Personally I'd like all covers and the album Ten rested for a tour. That would get them out of their comfort zone a little.
There's still a heap of iconic material for them to choose from.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 4:03 am
by super nintendo chalmers
Ed with White Reaper. They had one of my favorite singles last year CONSPIRITOR, I but never got around to checking their latest LP.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 12:34 pm
by broken iris
LetMeSleep wrote:Personally I'd like all covers and the album Ten rested for a tour. That would get them out of their comfort zone a little.
There's still a heap of iconic material for them to choose from.
I like the idea, but it's risky from a business standpoint to blacklist the songs you are most famous for. If I only got to see one PJ show, I would be kinda sad if they didn't do Even Flow, Alive, and Black.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 1:49 pm
by Bammer
Ed has been wearing PJ gear lately.
Not a fan.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 3:03 pm
by Monkey_Driven
Bammer wrote:Ed has been wearing PJ gear lately.
Not a fan.
Maybe he lost his luggage.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 9:43 pm
by 96583UP
Will wrote:
can't wait til that jam ends up in commercials for local market Ford dealerships
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sat October 04, 2014 9:47 pm
by BurtReynolds
will you shut up!
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Sun October 05, 2014 12:29 am
by LetMeSleep
Please don't.
Re: 2014-10-01: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: Mon October 06, 2014 7:31 pm
by corduroy2121
Lament wrote:
igotworms wrote:
corduroy2121 wrote:This is ridiculous to me. I mean if Pearl Jam is not one of your favorite bands any more, okay. Even if you truly believe that all of these bands are better than PJ these days. (nonsense) but what in the world are you spending your time on a PJ message board for then? 10,000 posts????
I apologize to those who are thoroughly offended at the thought that there's enough music out there in the world for me to prefer to see anyone to Pearl Jam, let alone fifty acts. I have a very music-centric job. This gives me more than enough time to care about/enjoy/be interested all of these bands. Sorry I have too many posts here for your liking. If it makes you feel better, the vast majority of them have nothing to do with Pearl Jam. There happen to be a number of really great people and super intelligent and interesting music fans here. They could official change this to a Jason Mraz board tomorrow and I'd still visit every day to interact with these people.
Thanks for the interesting response. It is hard for me to wrap my head around but i'll take your word for it. I guess i've never had enough time to be dedicated to a message board more than the band it is meant to focus on
