Page 7 of 31
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:20 pm
by stip
bada wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:I'm still not sure how they do this with 12 heroes most of whom everyone knows their real names. I gotta assume they just like the title?
I'm not familiar with the source book or whatever. So I don't know what you mean. But the title makes sense based on the trailer.
Basically the government wants to register everyone with super powers. Cap and Iron man disagree (and generally act out of character) over whether this is a good idea.
The central premise about oversight and registration makes sense even without the secret identity angle.
Cap's on the wrong side of this, though
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:21 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Damn it stip, way to bottom page my question. You suck.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:21 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
E.H. Ruddock wrote:bada wrote:I didn't realize the trailer was out
. I just watched it a page back looks like it's different from the comic but people are still acting out of character to advance the plot.
So do they all come back together after this civil war for the infinity stuff?
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:21 pm
by stip
E.H. Ruddock wrote:bada wrote:I didn't realize the trailer was out
. I just watched it a page back looks like it's different from the comic but people are still acting out of character to advance the plot.
So do they all come back together after this civil war for the infinity stuff?
The rumor is that they come back for part II, and part 1 is more focused on the other characters. So maybe space stuff with the guardians, new figures like Dr. strange, I presume Thor.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:22 pm
by stip
Part 1 is probably thanos getting the gauntlet
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:22 pm
by stip
durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Yeah, if they don't bring you any joy or entertainment or enlightenment, what's the point? You really should stop.
Yeah, you're right. Watching them just feels like work.
Blech. Cut the chord. You probably won't miss much. The Marvel films are terribly uneven. I haven't seen them all by any stretch. I find it easy to ignore them.
Will you see guardians already?
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:24 pm
by epilogue
stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Yeah, if they don't bring you any joy or entertainment or enlightenment, what's the point? You really should stop.
Yeah, you're right. Watching them just feels like work.
Blech. Cut the chord. You probably won't miss much. The Marvel films are terribly uneven. I haven't seen them all by any stretch. I find it easy to ignore them.
Will you see guardians already?
Just as soon as it's on Netflix, I'll watch it.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:26 pm
by bada
stip wrote:bada wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:I'm still not sure how they do this with 12 heroes most of whom everyone knows their real names. I gotta assume they just like the title?
I'm not familiar with the source book or whatever. So I don't know what you mean. But the title makes sense based on the trailer.
Basically the government wants to register everyone with super powers. Cap and Iron man disagree (and generally act out of character) over whether this is a good idea.
The central premise about oversight and registration makes sense even without the secret identity angle.
Cap's on the wrong side of this, though
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:27 pm
by epilogue
So wait, Cap is for and Tony against registration?
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:27 pm
by bada
Opposite.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:32 pm
by epilogue
Also, are the Netflix series' going to tie into this plot point, too? Seems like there's some of that registration stuff cropping up in JJ.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:33 pm
by epilogue
bada wrote:Opposite.
Cap against, Tony for?
That's what I got from the trailer. But why is Stip saying Cap's on the wrong side of this? Surely "mutant registration" isn't a good thing.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:33 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:Opposite.
Cap against, Tony for?
That's what I got from the trailer. But why is Stip saying Cap's on the wrong side of this? Surely "mutant registration" isn't a good thing.
oh man I'm excited for this discussion
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:35 pm
by epilogue
I only watched the trailer once, on my phone and I missed a good chunk of the dialogue. So maybe I'm way out of line, I don't know.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:35 pm
by stip
durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:Opposite.
Cap against, Tony for?
That's what I got from the trailer. But why is Stip saying Cap's on the wrong side of this? Surely "mutant registration" isn't a good thing.
You'd register a gun, wouldn't you?
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:35 pm
by stip
durdencommatyler wrote:I only watched the trailer once, on my phone and I missed a good chunk of the dialogue. So maybe I'm way out of line, I don't know.
No, cap is probably meant to be more sympathetic.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:36 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I, for one, think all Muslims should have to register.
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:36 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:Opposite.
Cap against, Tony for?
That's what I got from the trailer. But why is Stip saying Cap's on the wrong side of this? Surely "mutant registration" isn't a good thing.
You'd register a gun, wouldn't you?
yeah but owning a gun isn't like owning a superhero, stip.
TEAM SMAUG
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:37 pm
by stip
Though my limited understanding is that the 'accords' are about creating an oversight body for the avengers aka that council that governed shield
Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)
Posted: Wed November 25, 2015 5:37 pm
by stip
E.H. Ruddock wrote:stip wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:bada wrote:Opposite.
Cap against, Tony for?
That's what I got from the trailer. But why is Stip saying Cap's on the wrong side of this? Surely "mutant registration" isn't a good thing.
You'd register a gun, wouldn't you?
yeah but owning a gun isn't like owning a superhero, stip.
TEAM SMAUG
Superpowers don't kill people. People kill people