Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
SS has to make something like $800 million to break even. I don't understand that if it 'only' cost $175 million to make.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45832
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
If I remember correctly, Studios make a lot less per ticket on international sales than US, so international vs domestic sales revenues aren't the same.
That and marketing budgets are usually as high if not higher than the production budget. Crazy, but that's how it goes.
That and marketing budgets are usually as high if not higher than the production budget. Crazy, but that's how it goes.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
That makes sense I guess but SS is another great example of 10/10 marketing for a 3/10 film so what's going wrong?
'THR says the price tag for Suicide Squad was “at least $175 million” and that for the film to be a success, a studio veteran explains, “The movie’s got to do $750 million, $800 million to break even. If they get anywhere close to that, they’ll consider it a win.” That’s a lofty goal, and while the movie is tracking for a huge opening weekend, it will need to have legs to hit that mark.'
'THR says the price tag for Suicide Squad was “at least $175 million” and that for the film to be a success, a studio veteran explains, “The movie’s got to do $750 million, $800 million to break even. If they get anywhere close to that, they’ll consider it a win.” That’s a lofty goal, and while the movie is tracking for a huge opening weekend, it will need to have legs to hit that mark.'
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45832
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Whatever the math, it doesn't seem like a very sustainable business model.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
On average a studio needs to double the cost of the movie in sales to break even. That's before marketing
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Again they should all look at what deadpool did. Made for peanuts, marketed brilliantly but made about ten times its budget.
Do more with less.
Do more with less.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
And it was the absolute most faithful to the comics movie that's ever been made.dimejinky99 wrote:Again they should all look at what deadpool did. Made for peanuts, marketed brilliantly but made about ten times its budget.
Do more with less.
(Well, that and Sin City.)
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
"What? China? Nah, we don't worry about it. That's just pure profit. Like, money on top of money. Nothing a business would worry about."durdencommatyler wrote:No but it is worth noting, for sure. That's one out of many, many, many, many reasons why Hollywood hasn't cared much about international grosses. They've basically seen that as pure profit. Money on top of money
(patriotic choking noises)
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
McParadigm wrote:"What? China? Nah, we don't worry about it. That's just pure profit. Like, money on top of money. Nothing a business would worry about."durdencommatyler wrote:No but it is worth noting, for sure. That's one out of many, many, many, many reasons why Hollywood hasn't cared much about international grosses. They've basically seen that as pure profit. Money on top of money
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
tragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:
1. Wrath of Khan
2. JJ Abrams, pt 1
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
I did not get the chance to see this yesterday. 
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
You'll enjoy it I think. Even if only cos it's totally unlike the previous two.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
I goddamn loved the first two, though.
But I do like the idea of the third one being different.
But I do like the idea of the third one being different.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
durdencommatyler wrote:I goddamn loved the first two, though.
But I do like the idea of the third one being different.
Oh don't get me wrong I loved/liked the first two as well. But this succeeds for me for doing something different. In that it feels like an episode. And one of the episodes that really were great. That's really why I like it and think it works.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I goddamn loved the first two, though.
But I do like the idea of the third one being different.
Oh don't get me wrong I loved/liked the first two as well. But this succeeds for me for doing something different. In that it feels like an episode. And one of the episodes that really were great. That's really why I like it and think it works.
I need to fucking see this thing already.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
This is such a good posttragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:
1. Wrath of Khan
2. JJ Abrams, pt 1
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Film: Star Trek Beyond (2016)
tragabigzanda wrote:Oh! I can rank the Star Trek films I've seen:
2. JJ Abrams, pt 1
Did you like this Star Wars movie more than his other Star Wars movie?
Calibrate your enthusiasm