Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 9:29 pm
lol no it isn;t.tragabigzanda wrote:Killer take, Stip.stip wrote: And in the end Han ends up sacrificing himself for someone that he loves, with no guarantee of success and a high probability of failure. He has completed the journey that began in a New Hope. It is the perfect closure to his arc—much more than settling down with Leia for the happy ending.
wait, does alcohol even exist in star wars? i don't think we've ever seen anyone drunk on screen, so i guess we shouldn't assume that it exists since it's not acknowledged anywhere in the canon.spike wrote:maybe han solo's a closet alcoholic
but the summation of all the stories is interesting to us. maybe not to you, but nobody is obligated to like something just because a lot of other people do.BurtReynolds wrote:Thats the perfect summation of Star Wars:Mecca wrote:who said it was interesting? We accept it because it is plausible and that's all that is really needed.BurtReynolds wrote:But why is that interesting to you? How is the way it was handled interesting to you? You are simply told all of this in a few lines of dialogue (because Abrams is a hack). Anything could be interesting I suppose, but this isn't. And its pretty obvious that this bare bones backstory only exists to reset the the world to pre-Jedi, so fanboys can rehash the same shit over again.Strat wrote:Nah. We do believe he could be. We do believe he was. And we do believe, and find it totally plausible and okay that things changed.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The fact that you guys find it so hard to believe that Han could actually, genuinely be happily in love and not want to keep smuggling for criminals probably exposes the fundamental clash in how we're viewing this.
Plausibility is not the issue here. Get past that.
"not very interesting, but certainly plausible."
he could be addicted to death sticksspike wrote:wait, does alcohol even exist in star wars? i don't think we've ever seen anyone drunk on screen, so i guess we shouldn't assume that it exists since it's not acknowledged anywhere in the canon.spike wrote:maybe han solo's a closet alcoholic
it was this post, right?bada wrote:I feel like Mecca had this resolved but we choose to ignore it cause its more fun to argue.
Mecca wrote:can we just all agree that this will be shit without River Phoenix portraying a young Harrison Ford?
oh god, RM has no arc!LoathedVermin72 wrote:I started typing something in response to stip, but then I remembered I'm talking to stip. And this whole maelstrom started because I engaged with stip.
Why don't I fucking learn? Things truly are cyclical.
You are no different than stip, my friend.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I started typing something in response to stip, but then I remembered I'm talking to stip. And this whole maelstrom started because I engaged with stip.
Why don't I fucking learn? Things truly are cyclical.
Yes that post belongs in a museum.Mecca wrote:it was this post, right?bada wrote:I feel like Mecca had this resolved but we choose to ignore it cause its more fun to argue.Mecca wrote:can we just all agree that this will be shit without River Phoenix portraying a young Harrison Ford?
Nevermindspike wrote:oh god, RM has no arc!LoathedVermin72 wrote:I started typing something in response to stip, but then I remembered I'm talking to stip. And this whole maelstrom started because I engaged with stip.
Why don't I fucking learn? Things truly are cyclical.
I get what you're doing, but I'll be a sucker.Mecca wrote:sitting at home, being less cynical and musing about his glory daysbada wrote:If you are saying Jedi should have been the end of Star Wars and any continuation ruined the fairy tale then that's fine but if you are going to continue with those characters where should Han be thematically?
This is the single most offensive thing anyone has ever said to me. You should be banned for this. You should come down with a disease for saying something so hateful.Strat wrote:You are no different than stip, my friend.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I started typing something in response to stip, but then I remembered I'm talking to stip. And this whole maelstrom started because I engaged with stip.
Why don't I fucking learn? Things truly are cyclical.
bada wrote:We should move over to something we can all agree on like how awesome the GnR Reunion will be. C'Mon onto Other Bands!
its almost like they exist on opposite ends of a spectrum, like some sort of force with a duality constantly at war with itselfStrat wrote:You are no different than stip, my friend.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I started typing something in response to stip, but then I remembered I'm talking to stip. And this whole maelstrom started because I engaged with stip.
Why don't I fucking learn? Things truly are cyclical.