Re: I Feel Stupid And Contagious / A Nirvana Thread
Posted: Mon October 23, 2023 8:38 pm
I could be wrong, but I don’t think bands listen to their studio albums all that often.
That's interesting. Why do you think that?liebzz wrote:I could be wrong, but I don’t think bands listen to their studio albums all that often.
I can't speak to A but I often think about B. I think that makes a lot of sense and I feel like we (as PJ fans) have experienced that in real time with Ed, for example. But both of your points do make senses to me, and I think that's maybe the crux of this whole issue.tragabigzanda wrote:I don't think it's stupid at all, I think it has a ton of merit because it gets to the creative and commercial intentions of the artist...epilogue wrote:Obviously bands care about how they sound. That's not really up for debate. I just think it's interesting how often a fan will say "this sounds like shit!" but yet the artist still released it, knowing that they care how they sound. I just wonder how often an artist thinks the record sounds bad vs how often a fan does.
It's a stupid conversation for the internet, surely, but just something I think about. *shrugs*
I think Dave Grohl probably writes hooks because he loves hooks. I think his last record was compressed to within an inch of its life because A) he wants it to be as loud as any other song when it comes up on shuffle, and B) because like a lot of aging rock stars, he's losing his hearing.
It seemed anecdotally from rock bands that they put it down and then spend time rehearsing the songs and then play them a thousand times live, combined with the other music they listen to I would just imagine your own stuff is probably mostly left on the shelf. Plus, there’s nothing more awkward than hearing yourself on tape. I feel like once they’ve recorded the thing, they want to go out and play it, but wouldn’t be as interested in hearing the studio version at that point.epilogue wrote:That's interesting. Why do you think that?liebzz wrote:I could be wrong, but I don’t think bands listen to their studio albums all that often.
Obviously, I have no idea whether you're on the nose here or not, but just as an artist myself (in, admittedly, different mediums) that sounds literally insane.liebzz wrote:It seemed anecdotally from rock bands that they put it down and then spend time rehearsing the songs and then play them a thousand times live, combined with the other music they listen to I would just imagine your own stuff is probably mostly left on the shelf. Plus, there’s nothing more awkward than hearing yourself on tape. I feel like once they’ve recorded the thing, they want to go out and play it, but wouldn’t be as interested in hearing the studio version at that point.epilogue wrote:That's interesting. Why do you think that?liebzz wrote:I could be wrong, but I don’t think bands listen to their studio albums all that often.
tragabigzanda wrote:I'd maybe bump Life & Limb for Epic Problemtragabigzanda wrote:Top 10 maybe?
Hello Morning
Close Captioned
The Kill
Place/Position
Do You Like Me?
Latest Disgrace
Recap Modotti
Nightshop
Break
Life & Limb
i think that's the extent of it too. there's been several interviews over the years from multiple artists where they said they had to go find their own album on spotify to relearn how to play a song.tragabigzanda wrote:I think most artists go through a period of frequent critical listening as an album is wrapping, then maybe more as they're preparing to tour; and are otherwise not really interested in listening to their own records beyond that point.
They weren't wrong though. It has an extreme amount of treble and little else which renders it thin and gutless. The guitars sound like razors and the drums have no balls at all. It's especially shocking when you A/B it with what came after. I made a Soundgarden compilation for someone and I had to EQ the shit out of those songs to get them somewhat in line with everything else, and it still sounds like ass.VinylGuy wrote:SG and Matt C were frustrated with the sound of Badmotorfinger
This very much describes my relationship with my own creative ventures -- music, writing, etc. There are times when it is enjoyable to go back and relisten, re-read, etc., but most of the time it feels vulnerable and a little uncomfortable, even if I'm the only one in the room.tragabigzanda wrote:I think most artists go through a period of frequent critical listening as an album is wrapping, then maybe more as they're preparing to tour; and are otherwise not really interested in listening to their own records beyond that point.
I also think that LOUD mastering probably somewhat corresponds with the adrenaline, excitement, etc., most artists feel at the moment of a new project -- they've recorded these songs with big choruses, pounding drums, crunching guitars, etc., and hearing a finished product that just pushes all of that to its most absurd extreme reinforces that rush, at a stage in the creative process where excitement dominates nuance. I really think a lot of the purist concepts that listeners get hung up on as consumers (it's too overproduced, compressed, etc.) aren't even things that register with artists during the creative process. They're just coming at it from a completely different angle, and asking themselves different questions as they listen back -- can you make out the things that are happening in this song? Is it clear enough? Does it sound like the thing I had in my head? Is it powerful enough for listeners to hear it and respond to it? I think these things will take priority every time, and during the process of creation I think bands are easily persuaded by dubious tools if they think it will allow them to achieve those goals. And I don't think it's always about greed or sales; I really do think, for most artists, they just want to reach as many people as possible.tragabigzanda wrote:I think his last record was compressed to within an inch of its life because A) he wants it to be as loud as any other song when it comes up on shuffle, and B) because like a lot of aging rock stars, he's losing his hearing.
Me too, my old copy pretty much disintegrated, so I'm very much looking forward to the revised and expanded version out this week (whenever my copy actually arrives).washing machine wrote:Azerrad wrote "Come as you Are", the definitive Nirvana bio that I absolutely devoured in high school.