Page 61 of 472

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 2:12 am
by dimejinky99
a hater or a supporter of his?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 4:29 pm
by Simple Torture
Predictions for tonight?

Reading about some of the polls, especially the ones that have been predictive in the past, it looks like Cruz is coming on and Rubio is also gaining some ground. I imagine that Cruz and Trump will be so close that both are going to claim "victory"--if it's like 30% for Cruz and 28% for Trump, Trump can try and make a 2nd-place finish sound like he proved something. If Trump wins by a few percentage points, Cruz can talk about how he's been the underdog the whole time and is still coming on strong. Basically, we'll know nothing by the end of the night. So:

Trump: 26%
Cruz: 24%
Rubio: 19%
Also rans: the rest

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 4:35 pm
by Simple Torture
Oh, and:

Clinton: 47%
Sanders: 45%
O'Malley: I don't want to do the math, whatever's left
Chafee: If I were in Iowa, I'd try to caucus for Chafee

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 4:37 pm
by 4/5
A potential blizzard would have to be good for Bernie, right? Younger/more excited supporters, etc.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 6:16 pm
by stip
yup, but less habituated to the process so more likely to just say fuck it

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 7:23 pm
by bada
I am curious to see how Rubio does since I think he's the only one that could win the general. If he does well early he could take off. I still can't fathom a President Trump. Just doesn't seem possible. Cruz is impossible.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 7:47 pm
by Green Habit
stip wrote:yup, but less habituated to the process so more likely to just say fuck it
Do you think habituation is the main reason why young people don't vote as much? In my life I've never missed a general or primary election, including midterms, and frequently show up for off-schedule votes like on municipal bonds and such. I also went to a college that was pretty politically aware, so I didn't get a good pulse on this in my youth. I've tried to read some articles on the subject and have yet to find a satisfactory answer.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 8:13 pm
by McParadigm
4/5 wrote:A potential blizzard would have to be good for Bernie, right? Younger/more excited supporters, etc.
Isn't it just supposed to be a foot or less in Des Moines? I'd be surprised if that has a traumatic impact on Iowan involvement

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 10:09 pm
by Simple Torture
McParadigm wrote:
4/5 wrote:A potential blizzard would have to be good for Bernie, right? Younger/more excited supporters, etc.
Isn't it just supposed to be a foot or less in Des Moines? I'd be surprised if that has a traumatic impact on Iowan involvement
Is McP arguing against the apathy and laziness of the American voter? I think I just shit my pants.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 10:34 pm
by McParadigm
I'm arguing against the Midwest being smart enough to recognize dangerous driving conditions, especially where snow is concerned.

In the 80's, school in Sioux Falls was once let out early for bad weather after a tornado had touched down a few miles outside of town. "There's a twister on the ground. Get these shitheads on some busses."

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon February 01, 2016 11:05 pm
by Simple Torture
McParadigm wrote:I'm arguing against the Midwest being smart enough to recognize dangerous driving conditions
This checks out.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 12:47 am
by Norah
Who thought caucusing was the best way to do this?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 2:35 am
by Simple Torture
With 1/4 of precincts reporting, Cruz is close to 30% with Trump about 3% points behind. Rubio a predicted third with around 19%.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:13 am
by stip
Clinton and Sanders seem to be neck and neck. Sanders is outperforming the polling.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:14 am
by stip
Rubio seems to be doing better than expected as well.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:15 am
by Simple Torture
What happened, Donald?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:19 am
by BurtReynolds
do we have a new president yet?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:20 am
by Norah
Yeah it's Rubio.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:32 am
by Green Habit

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue February 02, 2016 3:38 am
by Simple Torture
Green Habit wrote:
The date on that is telling. Still...c'mon, did we really think this would be a thing? Although, some of the early-post-mortems I'm reading keep harping on the fact that Trump polls well and could perform well in straight primaries, but that caucuses don't really work with the type of campaign he's running.