Red Mosquito

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

Coherent Mucho
Understand Verily
BLM With Almonds

knee tunes wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

Coherent Mucho
Understand Verily
BLM With Almonds

How's that gang stalking treating you?

Bammer wrote:Hey GH can you summarize that into something I can read in about 8 seconds. Thanks.

Not sure if the relevant part here makes your 8 second limit, but it's no more than 14 seconds.

simple schoolboy wrote:pro BLM protest in May 2020

This was a less serious but still interesting example of the left letting their priors get in the way. It's less serious because since mass protests almost always take place outdoors, on the merits they were correct that the BLM protests were no big deal. But they should have also been more charitable to the action (without needing to endorse the message) of the anti-covid restriction protests that happened just before Floyd's death.

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

"Not very effective" is not equal to "terrible"

GH: Should we read into your use of the worder death as opposed to murder?

Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

B wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

"Not very effective" is not equal to "terrible"

How about "effective and terrible"?

Bammer wrote:GH: Should we read into your use of the worder death as opposed to murder?

Floyd was murdered, which is a subset of death. That ought to take care of that.

Green Habit wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:pro BLM protest in May 2020

This was a less serious but still interesting example of the left letting their priors get in the way. It's less serious because since mass protests almost always take place outdoors, on the merits they were correct that the BLM protests were no big deal. But they should have also been more charitable to the action (without needing to endorse the message) of the anti-covid restriction protests that happened just before Floyd's death.

Or Sturgis. All those people died.

Peeps wrote:Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

Still wearing your mask?

verb_to_trust wrote:

Peeps wrote:Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

Still wearing your mask?

The gym in the morning today was the first I didn’t. There was only about a dozen there. When I went grocery shopping I did. It’s all based on how comfortable I am

verb_to_trust wrote:Or Sturgis. All those people died.

My understanding with Sturgis is that it was doomed by people gathering indoors afterward.

Peeps wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Peeps wrote:Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

Still wearing your mask?

The gym in the morning today was the first I didn’t. There was only about a dozen there. When I went grocery shopping I did. It’s all based on how comfortable I am

Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

Green Habit wrote:

B wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bammer wrote:What is mph?

Masters in Public Health. Those that were adamant in February 2020 that Masks were terrible, pro BLM protest in May 2020, and generally shifted with the winds a dozen times during the pandemic. Useless human beings.

"Not very effective" is not equal to "terrible"

How about "effective and terrible"?

I got distracted and couldn't write more.

But in the beginning, the message seemed to be that we didn't think that masks did much in the way of protection and the fear that was by endorsing them you would encourage people to do more risky behaviors than they would otherwise.

That's a lot different than "masks are terrible."

There’s far more supply of vaccine than demand now. Can we lock ‘er up?

verb_to_trust wrote:

Peeps wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Peeps wrote:Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

Still wearing your mask?

The gym in the morning today was the first I didn’t. There was only about a dozen there. When I went grocery shopping I did. It’s all based on how comfortable I am

Why is it so hard for people to understand cdc guidelines are fluid and subject to change when more data is gathered?


It like if you never ate shrimp before and one day you eat it and feel fine. Then a week later you eat the same shrimp and more shrimp and find out your allergic to it.

You say after you ate the first time I wasn’t allergic to it but eating “this” amount I now realize I am allergic to it.

Why? Because you have more data

I know it’s tough for you to grasp but I was referring to fauccis emails and the change of guidelines


My county is about 31% fully vaccinated. We also have a lot of out of staters working at the cracker plant here. I don’t trust large crowds just yet. Maybe I will eventually but it is kind of my decision

So the vaccine doesn't work Peeps?

verb_to_trust wrote:So the vaccine doesn't work Peeps?

Oh wow you got him