Red Mosquito

A quick bit of context re the Q reviews editor - his other favourite albums this year include Foals, Bowie, Everything Everything, Manic Street Preachers, Arctic Monkeys, NiN and Arcade Fire. Make of that what you will.

igotworms wrote:I've been lurking around this board like a rapist for the past few weeks and have finally decided to register as I have some (minor) news regarding LB. UK-based music magazine Q is a pretty well regarded rag over these parts, and while its official review of LB hasn't been published yet, earlier today its reviews editor Niall Doherty tweeted that LB is amongst his favourite albums of the year. So while we don't actually have the first official review of the album as yet, we do know that it's going to be very favourable. Thought this little nugget might be of interest to some. I'll get back to my lurking again now.

welcome to the board have someone look at those worms

igotworms wrote:A quick bit of context re the Q reviews editor - his other favourite albums this year include Foals, Bowie, Everything Everything, Manic Street Preachers, Arctic Monkeys, NiN and Arcade Fire. Make of that what you will.

So, he's already heard Arcade Fire too?

Strat wrote:

stip wrote:

Strat wrote:

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:

Strat wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:

Strat wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:

Strat wrote:I dont like how PJ feel they need to be relevant. Neil young doesnt give a shit. he puts out music as he does and every so often, it will strike a nerve in the media/music listening public. Makes for a far more interesting career. Seems as though BOB is all about "hey man, need a hit to stay relevant, he he he!!"

And most depressing about all that is PJ are in agreement with him.

Sad Face.

There is a reason Binaural is top shelf

I think the Neil Young comparison here is irrelevant and misplaced. He's a SOLO artist. Totally different beast. He can go from Crazy Horse, to Daniel Lanois, to his wife Peggy, to CSN, etc.

A better comparison would be to find a GROUP that's had a 20 plus year career. Also, a group that's had signficant commercial success (where the benchmark of appealing to mass/cult audiences are different). That would be comparable.

If you still really want to compare them to Neil Young, I'd look at the band members individually, and if you look at say, Ed. and combine his PJ output that he wrote himself with ITW and Uke songs, you'd have a fairer comparison to Neil. Solo artists are completely different animals. Apples and oranges.

Not at all. Neil had massive success with Crazy Horse multiple times. Whats your point? As a group they could all collectively agree on having a career "like a solo artist" as you put it.

PJ are trying to stay relevant and make music so they can still fill arenas. That does not make for as interesting of a career.

Yeah, go ahead and compare Neil WITH Crazy Horse. Do it. Then you have a band with a distinctive "sloppy" style. And you'd also have decades-long gaps and which he went off into various cool or awful tangents, BY HIMSELF. My point is that it's apples and oranges. Like comparing a space shuttle with a jet ski. Groups are their own thing with their own pros and cons.

LOL, what?

If you can't understand the difference between a solo artist and a group, I can't help you. My awkward attempt and explaining it to you aside. LOL DUDE!

This isn't about the differences between a solo artist and a band. It's about the differences between the choices a solo artist might make, and the choices a band might make. And apart from the relative difficulty of a band making a unanimous choice about anything, there really is no difference. Both band and solo artist could choose to do whatever they chose, which honoured the integrity of their artistic drives, or to outsource everything because of a need to make it palatable and "commercial" to some imagined new demographic. In PJ's case, these two things might not be mutually exclusive, though, which is why nobody will ever win this argument.

I think his whole point is about the relative difficulty involved, though. The creative vision of a solo artist (even one who chooses to play with others) is really just a question of how much creativity that person has. The group dynamic is not just a question of your personal creativity and drive--it is figuring out how to get it to work in conjunction with other people who have different visions and varying levels of commitment, and getting everyone on the same page at the same time

Of course, but the entire band has always touted Neils vision as inspiring and how much they have learned from him. i think PJ are just too precious and its evident about how they feel they need to "fire the whole thing up" with every album release. Im sure that is overwhelming for them and perhaps why they choose to release albums every 4-5 years now. but it doesnt need to be that way. it doesnt need to be such a huge event. That is where they go the u2 route instead, which is very unfortunate.

perhaps. But look at how much we've crucified them for not promoting the album enough this time around. Imagine pearl jam says 'we've just about got an album done, and you'll hear it in a few months. See you later' that's not going to go over too well.


And at least pearl jam does seem to be quite good at these large build ups. that art thing was great, the trickle of information from the listening parties, the little vignettes. Look at how we respond to them...

And all of this is without a second single, any real band interviews, no EPK--none of the obvious stuff.


If you count the MYM thread and the album art thread I think we're at about 1000 pages in 3 months

I agree that its been great lead-up to the release but ultimately the long span between albums forces them to market and engage in such a way. i think most would be fine if albums were released regularly, or if even, random eps and experiments were dropped on us out of nowhere. Put that on top of bigger hyped albums then i think it would be a much more attractive approach to the fans. Trying to make these grandiose statements every 4 years, and having an approach as "oh, what kind of song would be awesome to get an arena pumping" is ultimately hurting the creative endeavor.

it certainly creates more pressure and drops the output

stip wrote:

igotworms wrote:I've been lurking around this board like a rapist for the past few weeks and have finally decided to register as I have some (minor) news regarding LB. UK-based music magazine Q is a pretty well regarded rag over these parts, and while its official review of LB hasn't been published yet, earlier today its reviews editor Niall Doherty tweeted that LB is amongst his favourite albums of the year. So while we don't actually have the first official review of the album as yet, we do know that it's going to be very favourable. Thought this little nugget might be of interest to some. I'll get back to my lurking again now.

welcome to the board have someone look at those worms

I was assuming his pet store specializes in worm farms

igotworms wrote:I like to focus on either lurking, crying or masturbating. I'm not much of a multi-tasker. Plus I'd be worried about using the wrong tissue to wipe my eyes.

Awesome!

igotworms wrote:A quick bit of context re the Q reviews editor - his other favourite albums this year include Foals, Bowie, Everything Everything, Manic Street Preachers, Arctic Monkeys, NiN and Arcade Fire. Make of that what you will.

just think guys. What happens if this album is actually really really good? I know it's a scary thought, but what if?

igotworms wrote:I like to focus on either lurking, crying or masturbating. I'm not much of a multi-tasker. Plus I'd be worried about using the wrong tissue to wipe my eyes.

3 posts in and your quantity to quality ratio is very high!

stip wrote:

igotworms wrote:A quick bit of context re the Q reviews editor - his other favourite albums this year include Foals, Bowie, Everything Everything, Manic Street Preachers, Arctic Monkeys, NiN and Arcade Fire. Make of that what you will.

just think guys. What happens if this album is actually really really good? I know it's a scary thought, but what if?

This thread would have to be narrowed down to about 4 pages

That's a disincentive to post again as I can only dilute the quality from here on in. Bummer.

well you had a good run.

who remembers The Consultant?

igotworms wrote:That's a disincentive to post again as I can only dilute the quality from here on in. Bummer.

pay no attention to stip. you need only hang around RM for awhile and your post quality will drop significantly, we promise.

stip wrote:

igotworms wrote:I like to focus on either lurking, crying or masturbating. I'm not much of a multi-tasker. Plus I'd be worried about using the wrong tissue to wipe my eyes.

3 posts in and your quantity to quality ratio is very high!

I love the board name too, one of my fave Jim Carrey quotes. Welcome!

Revelator wrote:

stip wrote:

igotworms wrote:I like to focus on either lurking, crying or masturbating. I'm not much of a multi-tasker. Plus I'd be worried about using the wrong tissue to wipe my eyes.

3 posts in and your quantity to quality ratio is very high!

I love the board name too, one of my fave Jim Carrey quotes. Welcome!

I've been lurking for months, just waiting - waiting! - for any good reason to post and here comes Mr. Steals The First Part of My Name and All of My Glory!

Well played igotworms...well played.

I felt like this should be acknowledged before I head back under my rock.

` igotshitinmypants out - to lurk some more!

I've been lurking around this board like a rapist for the past few weeks and have finally decided to register as I have some (minor) news regarding LB. UK-based music magazine Q is a pretty well regarded rag over these parts, and while its official review of LB hasn't been published yet, earlier today its reviews editor Niall Doherty tweeted that LB is amongst his favourite albums of the year. So while we don't actually have the first official review of the album as yet, we do know that it's going to be very favourable. Thought this little nugget might be of interest to some. I'll get back to my lurking again now.

I think this is interesting - Q are never hot on Pearl Jam. To be honest, they don't get much love in any of the British press. So this is really cool. Thanks for the info!

WIN @PearlJam tickets this afternoon w/ @pamonshore104 #LightningBolt Listen for the Pearl Jam #Sirens
Reply Retweet Favorite More
5
RETWEETS Try my PatienceMike DiVirgiliotenvsPaul Diaz
2:14 PM - 9 Sep 13
Tweet text
Reply to @Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104
Image will appear as a link
Dave Priaulx ‏@Dave_Priaulx 10 Sep
@Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104 Can you confirm if and when you will be playing Sirens by Pearl Jam?
Details
KimmieB ‏@Kimmiecooks 22h
@Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104 LIARS! Never played it!
Details
Shore 104 ‏@Shore104 19h
@kimmiecooks Pam Gleason would beg to differ! She heard the @PearlJam "Siren" just after 5:00 yesterday. (Early play today!) Good luck.
Details
Shore 104 ‏@Shore104 19h
@dave_priaulx Don't mean to confuse.We play a PJ 'siren' to let you know to call to win tix. We're waiting for the new music with ya!
Details
Dave Priaulx ‏@Dave_Priaulx 17h
@Shore104 Cool, thanks for clarifying.
Details
PearlJamOnLine.it ‏@PearlJamOnLine 4h
@Shore104 any news about Sirens?

wilkins wrote:WIN @PearlJam tickets this afternoon w/ @pamonshore104 #LightningBolt Listen for the Pearl Jam #Sirens
Reply Retweet Favorite More
5
RETWEETS Try my PatienceMike DiVirgiliotenvsPaul Diaz
2:14 PM - 9 Sep 13
Tweet text
Reply to @Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104
Image will appear as a link
Dave Priaulx ‏@Dave_Priaulx 10 Sep
@Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104 Can you confirm if and when you will be playing Sirens by Pearl Jam?
Details
KimmieB ‏@Kimmiecooks 22h
@Shore104 @PearlJam @PamonShore104 LIARS! Never played it!
Details
Shore 104 ‏@Shore104 19h
@kimmiecooks Pam Gleason would beg to differ! She heard the @PearlJam "Siren" just after 5:00 yesterday. (Early play today!) Good luck.
Details
Shore 104 ‏@Shore104 19h
@dave_priaulx Don't mean to confuse.We play a PJ 'siren' to let you know to call to win tix. We're waiting for the new music with ya!
Details
Dave Priaulx ‏@Dave_Priaulx 17h
@Shore104 Cool, thanks for clarifying.
Details
PearlJamOnLine.it ‏@PearlJamOnLine 4h
@Shore104 any news about Sirens?

This confuses me.

Lucky for everyone I speak gibberish.

They tweeted a hashtag of Sirens, leading everyone to believe they were going to play Sirens, when in fact they were going to play A SIREN not the song.

They are waiting for new music the same we all are.

The Shore's tweets were misleading and taking advantage of the situation, they play a siren noise before a PJ song for your queue to call in, not actually playing the song Sirens, not actually possessing Sirens, nor do they know anything about it.

I'm thinking it, or whatever the next single might be, will be coming closer to the record release, as someone said earlier...

Wish the whole record would leak soon. This is all akin to a community social experiment.