Red Mosquito

B wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Im sorry but i began to watch it and she was complaining about whats the suicide squad about?

Lady, read the comics please.

You might enjoy it more if you imagine she's playing Amanda Waller pitching the Suicide Squad to her superior.

This is the only Amanda Waller I recognize:

Y'know, as bad as this movie is, it's at least better than those garbage CW shows

Also Ant-Man. It's better than Ant-Man.

theplatypus wrote:Y'know, as bad as this movie is, it's at least better than those garbage CW shows

I would agree with this with the exception of Arrow.

Is it worse than star wars?

I would say its better than the tv shows, ant man and both Thor. And every Hulk movie.

I don't know, guys. I hate superhero shit, but in its current form, this "movie" is seriously unwatchable. Even I don't think I'd say it's better than Marvel movies. At least those are competently edited.

There is more cinema, more intention of doing something different and compelling in SS than in Ant Man.

VinylGuy wrote:There is more cinema, more intention of doing something different and compelling in SS than in Ant Man.

Yeah, but who cares when it's assembled so horrendously that you can't even make it out?

I do.

I prefer a failed experiment than something as bland as ant man or thor. Thats tv man.

VinylGuy wrote:I do.

I prefer a failed experiment than something as bland as ant man or thor. Thats tv man.

You know I agree. And I don't plan on ever watching Ant-Man. But Suicide Squad is a depressing waste of time right now. Crushed, obscured vision to this extreme isn't really better than bland, workmanlike emptiness.

What it might bummed you out is that this movie was meant to be awesome. And its not.

Ant man was a fun movie. Hardly one of the best (it's top of the bottom for me) but it had lots of clever scenes and winning characters. The shrinking stuff was well done. I'm not sure why it wasn't 'cinematic' or what that even means

stip wrote:Ant man was a fun movie. Hardly one of the best (it's top of the bottom for me) but it had lots of clever scenes and winning characters. The shrinking stuff was well done. I'm not sure why it wasn't 'cinematic' or what that even means

translation: "It wasn't dark and gritty enough."

Guys, you are better than this.

CW Flash is so fun.

VinylGuy wrote:Guys, you are better than this.

That's where you're wrong!

stip wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:Guys, you are better than this.

That's where you're wrong!

VinylGuy wrote:I do.

I prefer a failed experiment than something as bland as ant man or thor. Thats tv man.

Just got back from seeing this.

Yeah, I didn't dig it at all. I was BORED for most of it. I didn't even think Margot Robbie was that good, considering most people keep saying she's one of the best things in the movie. Will Smith was great, though.

I didn't care for Leto's interpretation of The Joker at all. Whenever I watch him in movies it feels like he's just trying too hard. It's so forced. This gangster Joker did absolutely nothing for me.

Interestingly, the brief cameos from Affleck's Batman were more entertaining than anything he did in Batman vs Superman.