Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Thu September 17, 2015 10:00 pm
oh
and he'll be out again in what, a week with some new injury?cutuphalfdead wrote:Since returning Pedroia is 11 for 29 with 3 dingers.MattA75 wrote:My dream is to never see Pedroia in a Red Sox uniform again...7 games over .500 without him, 17 games under with him this year
Probably, but his presence in the lineup now isn't hurting the team.MattA75 wrote:and he'll be out again in what, a week with some new injury?cutuphalfdead wrote:Since returning Pedroia is 11 for 29 with 3 dingers.MattA75 wrote:My dream is to never see Pedroia in a Red Sox uniform again...7 games over .500 without him, 17 games under with him this year
I feel like he hasn't been the same guy since they fired his binky..."Bobby needs to learn that's not how we do things around here"...his contract is atrocious...he's always hurt...I appreciate what's he has done for the team but that contract extension he got from Cherington might be the worst contract of Cherington's tenurenumbers wrote:How can anyone hate Pedroia?
That was one of the more embarrassing sports quotes I can remember.MattA75 wrote:I feel like he hasn't been the same guy since they fired his binky..."Bobby needs to learn that's not how we do things around here"...his contract is atrocious...he's always hurt...I appreciate what's he has done for the team but that contract extension he got from Cherington might be the worst contract of Cherington's tenurenumbers wrote:How can anyone hate Pedroia?

There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
That's what I thought too but still.philpritchard wrote:I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
Yeah, and if they're going to trade an outfielder for pitching, they should probably target someone better than Chris Young.cutuphalfdead wrote:That's what I thought too but still.philpritchard wrote:I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
None of this makes any sense!philpritchard wrote:Yeah, and if they're going to trade an outfielder for pitching, they should probably target someone better than Chris Young.cutuphalfdead wrote:That's what I thought too but still.philpritchard wrote:I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
I want Alex Gordon if that's the path they choose.cutuphalfdead wrote:That's what I thought too but still.philpritchard wrote:I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!
numbers wrote:I want Alex Gordon if that's the path they choose.cutuphalfdead wrote:That's what I thought too but still.philpritchard wrote:I mean... it would make sense if they want to trade Bradley for a pitcher, maybe.cutuphalfdead wrote:At least one of them fulfills a positional need!philpritchard wrote:There's a right Chris Young?cutuphalfdead wrote:Why are we looking at Chris Young? The wrong Chris Young!