Red Mosquito

@SkitchP wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Self wrote:70k is not a deterrent.

No joke. I just wish they'd fucking ban the guy already.

Per the NFL rules, this was his first "safety related" offense.

@SkitchP wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Self wrote:70k is not a deterrent.

No joke. I just wish they'd fucking ban the guy already.

Per the NFL rules, this was his first "safety related" offense.


from Mlive

"Apparently the league modified its repeat offender policy earlier this year, according to NFL Network's Judy Battista. Now players can wipe their slates clean if they go 32 straight games without committing the same crime.

That includes the regular season, postseason and two games in the preseason.

And that modification could not have come at a better time for Suh, who had gone exactly 32 games since his last safety-related violation, a low block against Minnesota's John Sullivan in the 2013 season opener that drew a record $100,000 fine.

So despite eight previous fines, seven of which were for safety violations, the defensive tackle was actually considered a first-time offender when it came to the Rodgers play.

And with those priors thrown out, hearings officer Ted Cottrell didn't think Suh stepping on Rodgers warranted a suspension.

That's a pretty lucky break for Suh, who was playing his very first game with a clean slate. And it gets even luckier.

Suh originally was docked $31,500 for driving his helmet into Browns quarterback Brandon Weeden during a Week 6 game last year, which would have cast him right back into that repeat offender pool. But that fine was later rescinded."

EJ wrote:this wknd:

Panthers
Bengals
Steelers
Cowboys

Mecca wrote:

EJ wrote:this wknd:

Panthers
Bengals
Steelers
Cowboys

you think Andy Dalton has what it takes?

durdencommatyler wrote:I'll take:

Ravens
Colts
Cowboys
Panthers

@SkitchP wrote:Lions
Lions
Lions
Lions

Simple Torture wrote:Wtf is with the Arizona punter?