Re: Dance of the Clairvoyants
Posted: Thu January 23, 2020 11:19 pm
I do hear arctic monkeys a little bit though.
No but I think the intentional touchstones are what’s important and interesting.theplatypus wrote:Do you think the only way similarities can exist is for them to be intentional?
if its not eds voice, what else are we gonna talk about? Dave Abbruzuzuzuzessee?scrub12 wrote:I’m having a hard time seeing where Ed sounds bad. This sounds right in his wheelhouse at this stage in his life.
Yeah, I think he sounds great. Not great with a series of asterisks (his age, his declining abilities, etc.), just plain great.scrub12 wrote:I’m having a hard time seeing where Ed sounds bad. This sounds right in his wheelhouse at this stage in his life.
Ditto.Birds in Hell wrote:Yeah, I think he sounds great. Not great with a series of asterisks (his age, his declining abilities, etc.), just plain great.scrub12 wrote:I’m having a hard time seeing where Ed sounds bad. This sounds right in his wheelhouse at this stage in his life.
I thought he quit.Chris_H_2 wrote:i wonder how much better ed would sound if he had just taken a break from the cigarettes. he always sounds so stuffy and congested.
Dave A 4-everStrat wrote:if its not eds voice, what else are we gonna talk about? Dave Abbruzuzuzuzessee?scrub12 wrote:I’m having a hard time seeing where Ed sounds bad. This sounds right in his wheelhouse at this stage in his life.
especially once the song gets goingSgt. Crackpot wrote:Ditto.Birds in Hell wrote:Yeah, I think he sounds great. Not great with a series of asterisks (his age, his declining abilities, etc.), just plain great.scrub12 wrote:I’m having a hard time seeing where Ed sounds bad. This sounds right in his wheelhouse at this stage in his life.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is just the sound of a dude in his 50s.wease wrote:I thought he quit.Chris_H_2 wrote:i wonder how much better ed would sound if he had just taken a break from the cigarettes. he always sounds so stuffy and congested.
This is what happens when Westerberg stops writing music for us.verb_to_trust wrote:I bet Ive listened to this song 50 times already. I'm still sort of in shock that I liked it.
Bruce Dickinson is 61 and Rob Halford is 68. Everyone is obviously different, but, I find this to be a bit of a weak excuse.Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is just the sound of a dude in his 50s.wease wrote:I thought he quit.Chris_H_2 wrote:i wonder how much better ed would sound if he had just taken a break from the cigarettes. he always sounds so stuffy and congested.
a) rob halford does not sound as good at age 68. no one on the planet does who is a hard rock singer. no one. no one at all.oneway23 wrote:Bruce Dickinson is 61 and Rob Halford is 68. Everyone is obviously different, but, I find this to be a bit of a weak excuse.Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is just the sound of a dude in his 50s.wease wrote:I thought he quit.Chris_H_2 wrote:i wonder how much better ed would sound if he had just taken a break from the cigarettes. he always sounds so stuffy and congested.
I read someone on here the other day say that this is a result of Ed "going for it" for the past twenty-nine years. Look, I'm eternally grateful for everything he has provided me, but, there are many other singers who also have spent their careers "going for it" and simply haven't deteriorated to the same degree.
Thom Yorke is 51, and while he might not reach the heights he once did, I just don't believe that the band needs to consider working around his limitations when coming up with new material. Black Francis still sounds phenomenal live. His vocal choices on the new record are very clearly artistic.
To be fair, this could be worse, right? Ed could be Bono or Axl Rose