Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 11:22 am
Lebron James is good at basketball and melodrama.
Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
Monkey_Driven wrote:Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I'm not sure why Love's elbow wasn't reviewed. Could have easily been a flagrant.
Love's Kiss would be a good name for it.Electromatic wrote:Love's elbow should be someones finishing move shouldn't it? It sounds like something Draymond would do.Monkey_Driven wrote:Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I'm not sure why Love's elbow wasn't reviewed. Could have easily been a flagrant.
In the second round they pretty much play every other day. It's the Finals and first round that have the huge breaks between games.Electromatic wrote:Don't they get two weeks off between games in the NBA?verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I couldn’t believe they didn’t review that play. They review for far less all the time, and that would’ve easily been called a flagrant.Monkey_Driven wrote:Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I'm not sure why Love's elbow wasn't reviewed. Could have easily been a flagrant.
Kudos to DeRozan for taking it and moving on. Most players would have writhed on the ground for 10 minutes in horrible "pain".PHATJ wrote:I couldn’t believe they didn’t review that play. They review for far less all the time, and that would’ve easily been called a flagrant.Monkey_Driven wrote:Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I'm not sure why Love's elbow wasn't reviewed. Could have easily been a flagrant.
He got clocked. So yeah, kudos for not dying on the court like a soccer player on the pitch. But if he had reacted a bit more, I’m sure they would’ve reviewed and they would’ve gotten the call.Monkey_Driven wrote:Kudos to DeRozan for taking it and moving on. Most players would have writhed on the ground for 10 minutes in horrible "pain".PHATJ wrote:I couldn’t believe they didn’t review that play. They review for far less all the time, and that would’ve easily been called a flagrant.Monkey_Driven wrote:Seems like his M.O.verb_to_trust wrote:That 47 mins he played should serve him well the rest of the series. I predict he coasts most of game two. All of it if it's a blowout.
I'm not sure why Love's elbow wasn't reviewed. Could have easily been a flagrant.
Both?4/5 wrote:So which is it:
The Raptors should feel okay about last night because Cavs besides LeBron actually showed up and that probably won't happen many more times.
Or
The Cavs should feel good about last night because they won despite LeBron not being very good.
He could definitely use some NBA Finals-style extended days of rest, that's for sure.verb_to_trust wrote:Niether. Lebron isn't going to have the juice to get through this series but still might win anyway because of Trashtors.
Telling, considering Van Fleet injured his shoulder earlier in the game.verb_to_trust wrote:Fred Van Fleet took the clutch shots last night where LeBron hit that tough fade. Tells you all you need to know about the two teams.