Page 65 of 175

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 8:16 pm
by Norah
Me too, but I'm guessing mookie gets traded.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 9:35 pm
by numbers
I honestly don't know if there is any pitcher in the game I would trade Betts for. I know that sounds crazy, but, even if you could get Kershaw for Betts I would rather have Price and Betts.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 9:45 pm
by Norah
I'd probably trade him for syndegaard.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 10:05 pm
by numbers
I know everyone is taking DD's "something painful" comment to mean trading Betts, Bogaerts, even Pedroia, or something like that but it could also mean taking on a less than ideal long term contract for a SP.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 11:45 pm
by Simple Torture
Silver Slugger for Xander! :hooray:

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Thu November 12, 2015 11:58 pm
by philpritchard
cutuphalfdead wrote:I'd probably trade him for syndegaard.
This hurts my heart so much.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Fri November 13, 2015 3:22 am
by Norah
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I'd probably trade him for syndegaard.
This hurts my heart so much.
:)

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 12:49 am
by MattA75
Not sure how I feel about this Kimbrel trade...though I guess if they're dealing who they dealt, that (hopefully) means Betts and Bogaerts are safe

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 12:58 am
by numbers
I like the move.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 1:03 am
by Simple Torture
Upset that moved Margot; from everything I read/saw, it seemed like he had a pretty high ceiling. But you never know, he coulda bottomed out unto a utility infielder.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 1:56 am
by Coach
Love it.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 2:01 am
by philpritchard
I know the Sox are loaded with young talent, but paying that kind of price for a closer is always risky.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 6:32 am
by Norah
numbers wrote:I like the move.
me too

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 1:07 pm
by Coach
philpritchard wrote:I know the Sox are loaded with young talent, but paying that kind of price for a closer is always risky.
But at least they got pitching help. If the end product was a hitter, I'd agree with you. But, I can never fault a team for going after all-start, prime of their career pitching w/o the bloated contract.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 2:06 pm
by numbers
If they were emptying their farm system to make this move, I'd be against it, but even after this they still have one of the strongest farm systems in the game and they didn't give up anyone that was going to be in the major leagues in the next couple of years.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 9:14 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:If they were emptying their farm system to make this move, I'd be against it, but even after this they still have one of the strongest farm systems in the game and they didn't give up anyone that was going to be in the major leagues in the next couple of years.
Also, with X and Betts there wasn't enough room for all of them when they did come up.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sat November 14, 2015 9:19 pm
by Simple Torture
Somehow I misunderstood some Tweets about the trade and thought Kimbrel only had one year left on his contract--it's better to hear we've got him for at least three years.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Sun November 15, 2015 10:41 pm
by CopperTom
Congrats! He was a joy to watch.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Tue November 17, 2015 5:56 pm
by Norah
Ortiz is retiring after the 2016 season.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Posted: Tue November 17, 2015 6:00 pm
by numbers
It's going to SUCK when he's gone.