Are you not not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply

Select your response

Yes
10
45%
No
7
32%
The future is hazy
4
18%
Double negatives are really confusing
1
5%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:"violence is illegal, speech is not" is not "data" Tree
It informs one to conclude that the person speaking was not wrong, but the person being violent was.
a Nazi is speaking hate at a Nazi rally

he gets punched and he's no longer able to chat his shit

the Nazi was violent, the person punching him did a cool thing
If it is hate speech and was inciting violence, then I can see this becoming more debatable. The motives are clearer in that scenario. When it comes to a comedian like Chris Rock, in this instance, it's just incomparable.
no, ableism is hate speech
But you don't know it was ableism. She felt offended for such reasons, yes? But do you really believe Chris Rock was actively trying to hurt her feelings? You said before that it doesn't matter what his intentions were. Therefore, her feelings trump all, yes?
she was the butt of the joke, so that's the easiest "yes" of my life
He said "Hi, Love you" and compared her to a hot character in an old movie, because they both have short hair... ohhh burrnnnnn
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Malloy wrote:never thought grover furr’s unimpeachables would get dragged into this
The kind of discourse we're witnessing on this page is neo-Stalinist, which is good, actually.
my position is communist-adjacent; Stalinist? no
Your position is not "communist-adjacent" and this is a MLG joke that was not meant for you.
well, it is, but OK Mickey
It absolutely is not. Words have distinct meanings and being vaguely on the left in the interminable online culture wars--even declaring one's self "not a liberal," though the evidence for that is suspect--does not make one "adjacent" to a discrete and historically specific political position.
"I've only ever seen you in a few discussions and they were all online! there's no way you've thought about your politics beyond what my own eyes have seen!"
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23544
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Anders »

warehouse wrote:
Anders wrote:Violence in all of its forms is poisonous and destructive. There is no place for violence in a world of love and kindness.
wtf world do you live in?
This is a quote from Will Smith.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:"violence is illegal, speech is not" is not "data" Tree
It informs one to conclude that the person speaking was not wrong, but the person being violent was.
a Nazi is speaking hate at a Nazi rally

he gets punched and he's no longer able to chat his shit

the Nazi was violent, the person punching him did a cool thing
If it is hate speech and was inciting violence, then I can see this becoming more debatable. The motives are clearer in that scenario. When it comes to a comedian like Chris Rock, in this instance, it's just incomparable.
no, ableism is hate speech
But you don't know it was ableism. She felt offended for such reasons, yes? But do you really believe Chris Rock was actively trying to hurt her feelings? You said before that it doesn't matter what his intentions were. Therefore, her feelings trump all, yes?
she was the butt of the joke, so that's the easiest "yes" of my life
He said "Hi, Love you" and compared her to a hot character in an old movie, because they both have short hair... ohhh burrnnnnn
and back to square one

this was fun Tree
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
tree_ wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:"violence is illegal, speech is not" is not "data" Tree
It informs one to conclude that the person speaking was not wrong, but the person being violent was.
a Nazi is speaking hate at a Nazi rally

he gets punched and he's no longer able to chat his shit

the Nazi was violent, the person punching him did a cool thing
If it is hate speech and was inciting violence, then I can see this becoming more debatable. The motives are clearer in that scenario. When it comes to a comedian like Chris Rock, in this instance, it's just incomparable.
no, ableism is hate speech
But you don't know it was ableism. She felt offended for such reasons, yes? But do you really believe Chris Rock was actively trying to hurt her feelings? You said before that it doesn't matter what his intentions were. Therefore, her feelings trump all, yes?
she was the butt of the joke, so that's the easiest "yes" of my life
He said "Hi, Love you" and compared her to a hot character in an old movie, because they both have short hair... ohhh burrnnnnn
and back to square one

this was fun Tree
If what Chris Rock did was ableism or a hate crime, everyone must be a Nazi. Looneyville.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

:lol:
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by The Argonaut »

Don't call names, tree. I will ban you
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

The Argonaut wrote:Don't call names, tree. I will ban you
I didn't... looneyville is a place
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by warehouse »

Anders wrote:
warehouse wrote:
Anders wrote:Violence in all of its forms is poisonous and destructive. There is no place for violence in a world of love and kindness.
wtf world do you live in?
This is a quote from Will Smith.
after talking to his lawyer?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Malloy wrote:never thought grover furr’s unimpeachables would get dragged into this
The kind of discourse we're witnessing on this page is neo-Stalinist, which is good, actually.
my position is communist-adjacent; Stalinist? no
Your position is not "communist-adjacent" and this is a MLG joke that was not meant for you.
well, it is, but OK Mickey
It absolutely is not. Words have distinct meanings and being vaguely on the left in the interminable online culture wars--even declaring one's self "not a liberal," though the evidence for that is suspect--does not make one "adjacent" to a discrete and historically specific political position.
"I've only ever seen you in a few discussions and they were all online! there's no way you've thought about your politics beyond what my own eyes have seen!"
Your politics beyond this thread are entirely irrelevant.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

wow imagine if throwing slurs at people was a bannable offence, how weird and draconian that would be!
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Yeah, if you have different opinions than what you've typed on here, how could any of us possibly know?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

warehouse wrote:
Anders wrote:
warehouse wrote:
Anders wrote:Violence in all of its forms is poisonous and destructive. There is no place for violence in a world of love and kindness.
wtf world do you live in?
This is a quote from Will Smith.
after talking to his lawyer?
Don't be absurd, he has more than one lawyer.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11941
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by The Argonaut »

tree_ wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Don't call names, tree. I will ban you
I didn't... looneyville is a place
Reign it in or face my wrath
Please consider voting for me
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Malloy wrote:never thought grover furr’s unimpeachables would get dragged into this
The kind of discourse we're witnessing on this page is neo-Stalinist, which is good, actually.
my position is communist-adjacent; Stalinist? no
Your position is not "communist-adjacent" and this is a MLG joke that was not meant for you.
well, it is, but OK Mickey
It absolutely is not. Words have distinct meanings and being vaguely on the left in the interminable online culture wars--even declaring one's self "not a liberal," though the evidence for that is suspect--does not make one "adjacent" to a discrete and historically specific political position.
"I've only ever seen you in a few discussions and they were all online! there's no way you've thought about your politics beyond what my own eyes have seen!"
Your politics beyond this thread are entirely irrelevant.
I made a statement about where I stood politically as a whole, so no, they aren't; I get called an evil commie a lot, I thought that was what you were doing -- I was wrong; I'm not sure what else you want for the observations and records you're drawing up about me
User avatar
Malloy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2865
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Malloy »

muddying the waters of communist discourse is not permitted, harmless.

now bring me, brandish your deboning knife & cut my mortal coil
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
User avatar
tree_
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 20305
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
Contact:

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by tree_ »

Argo, I don't care if you have a different opinion than me. That's obviously fine. But when you continuously misrepresent my words, I will correct you and tell you what I actually said.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Ms Harmless »

tree_ wrote:Yeah, if you have different opinions than what you've typed on here, how could any of us possibly know?
I don't, I'm literally laying out to RM the entirety of my thought processes, and when I've finished downloading the contents of my brain and my heart onto here, I will die
Last edited by Ms Harmless on Wed March 30, 2022 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Malloy wrote:never thought grover furr’s unimpeachables would get dragged into this
The kind of discourse we're witnessing on this page is neo-Stalinist, which is good, actually.
my position is communist-adjacent; Stalinist? no
Your position is not "communist-adjacent" and this is a MLG joke that was not meant for you.
well, it is, but OK Mickey
It absolutely is not. Words have distinct meanings and being vaguely on the left in the interminable online culture wars--even declaring one's self "not a liberal," though the evidence for that is suspect--does not make one "adjacent" to a discrete and historically specific political position.
"I've only ever seen you in a few discussions and they were all online! there's no way you've thought about your politics beyond what my own eyes have seen!"
Your politics beyond this thread are entirely irrelevant.
I made a statement about where I stood politically as a whole, so no, they aren't; I get called an evil commie a lot, I thought that was what you were doing -- I was wrong; I'm not sure what else you want for the observations and records you're drawing up about me
Wrong:
Ms. Harmless wrote:
Mickey wrote:The kind of discourse we're witnessing on this page is neo-Stalinist, which is good, actually.
my position is communist-adjacent; Stalinist? no
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Are you not going to watch the Oscars this year?

Post by Mickey »

If you thought that was what you were doing you did a piss-poor job of it!
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post Reply