Re: Israel & Palestine
Posted: Wed September 18, 2024 12:13 pm
I'm lovin the US response
*steps back hands up* nothin to do with us..yer on yer own there Bibi 
so they were put into the devices at some point in the manufacturing stage, so US EU (Belgium?) and then Taiwan.E.H. Ruddock wrote:They can’t just blow up your shit and that isn’t what happened. Israel got word that a large shipment of pagers was ordered by hezbollah and they were able to intercept and plant their pagers with bombs in the order. I’m sure this was a months long operation. Not justifying it but they can’t just randomly blow devices up
It’s unlikely that amount of explosive would threaten a plane. Current reporting is that they did not fatally wound the majority of the wearersB wrote:Yeah, It'd be a bummer if a Hezbollah dick had the window seat next to me.
"Did not fatally wound" is not the same as "will not hurt me, crack a window or seal on the plane, start a fire in the fuselage, or cause a panic among the passengers that results in several being hurt" so, you're assurances are cold comfort for would be flyers.Bi_3 wrote:It’s unlikely that amount of explosive would threaten a plane. Current reporting is that they did not fatally wound the majority of the wearersB wrote:Yeah, It'd be a bummer if a Hezbollah dick had the window seat next to me.
Quit fact checking dime, ABC!E.H. Ruddock wrote:They can’t just blow up your shit and that isn’t what happened. Israel got word that a large shipment of pagers was ordered by hezbollah and they were able to intercept and plant their pagers with bombs in the order. I’m sure this was a months long operation. Not justifying it but they can’t just randomly blow devices up
B wrote:"Did not fatally wound" is not the same as "will not hurt me, crack a window or seal on the plane, start a fire in the fuselage, or cause a panic among the passengers that results in several being hurt" so, you're assurances are cold comfort for would be flyers.Bi_3 wrote:It’s unlikely that amount of explosive would threaten a plane. Current reporting is that they did not fatally wound the majority of the wearersB wrote:Yeah, It'd be a bummer if a Hezbollah dick had the window seat next to me.
dimejinky99 wrote:And again. This time phone and phone shops
so the bbc and sky news are wrong..Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:And again. This time phone and phone shops
Not phones. That is false.
The link says hand-held radios.dimejinky99 wrote:so the bbc and sky news are wrong..Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:And again. This time phone and phone shops
Not phones. That is false.
ok
how do you know? are you there?
anything you wanna tell us Bi?
That's why I chose the word "bummer" and not the word "catastrophe."Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:"Did not fatally wound" is not the same as "will not hurt me, crack a window or seal on the plane, start a fire in the fuselage, or cause a panic among the passengers that results in several being hurt" so, you're assurances are cold comfort for would be flyers.Bi_3 wrote:It’s unlikely that amount of explosive would threaten a plane. Current reporting is that they did not fatally wound the majority of the wearersB wrote:Yeah, It'd be a bummer if a Hezbollah dick had the window seat next to me.
Obviously even a small bomb will hurt you if you are next to it and cause a panic bro. If downing a plane was that easy it would have been done.
Yeah seriously.Simple Torture wrote:Not for nothing but if my homie’s beeper exploded yesterday, I wouldn’t be carrying around my walkie talkie today.
10 year old girl. they got her. so badassStrat wrote:Kind of badass