Page 65 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 8:16 pm
by MattA75
elliseamos wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I get the frustration, and that definitely makes sense. I just find it frustrating when we know so little about the nature of an injury and then people start calling the player out. It's the same thing when a pitcher misses a start because of a blister and people scream about how he needs to toughen up and pitch through it, as if that's even possible. If fans want pitchers to pitch with a blister (or a bad shoulder, elbow, whatever) they might as well be pitching with one leg.

But yeah, when it consistently happens with one player, I understand the frustration.
if he hadn't missed 3 1/2 months for basically nothing, and if he hadn't had extra rest before each of his postseason starts, and if he had actually made 30 starts in a season at some point, I might be willing to cut Buchholz a break...dude is fragile, be it physically, mentally, or both. He should be the guy they trade after the season...
That's exactly the kind of comment that frustrates me. A pitcher with a shoulder injury simply can't win. If he goes out and tries to pitch through it and sucks, then he's hurting the team and any injury talk is just making excuses. If he sits out and lets it heal, then he's a pussy for not playing through it.
is anyone here overlooking the fact that the Sox team doctors have an incredibly bad track record? i think somebody is...

also, Vaseline will make blay cuchholz be the player he was pre-injury.
James Andrews has about as spotless a record as you can have, and he said Buchholz was fine
i'm pretty clearly not talking about him.
obviously, but the fact they went to him at all shows they weren't all that confident with what their doctors were saying

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 8:21 pm
by Coach
Man, Pearl Jam music during WS + Sox in the WS. Pinch me!

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 8:30 pm
by elliseamos
MattA75 wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:I get the frustration, and that definitely makes sense. I just find it frustrating when we know so little about the nature of an injury and then people start calling the player out. It's the same thing when a pitcher misses a start because of a blister and people scream about how he needs to toughen up and pitch through it, as if that's even possible. If fans want pitchers to pitch with a blister (or a bad shoulder, elbow, whatever) they might as well be pitching with one leg.

But yeah, when it consistently happens with one player, I understand the frustration.
if he hadn't missed 3 1/2 months for basically nothing, and if he hadn't had extra rest before each of his postseason starts, and if he had actually made 30 starts in a season at some point, I might be willing to cut Buchholz a break...dude is fragile, be it physically, mentally, or both. He should be the guy they trade after the season...
That's exactly the kind of comment that frustrates me. A pitcher with a shoulder injury simply can't win. If he goes out and tries to pitch through it and sucks, then he's hurting the team and any injury talk is just making excuses. If he sits out and lets it heal, then he's a pussy for not playing through it.
is anyone here overlooking the fact that the Sox team doctors have an incredibly bad track record? i think somebody is...

also, Vaseline will make blay cuchholz be the player he was pre-injury.
James Andrews has about as spotless a record as you can have, and he said Buchholz was fine
i'm pretty clearly not talking about him.
obviously, but the fact they went to him at all shows they weren't all that confident with what their doctors were saying
if anything, it was going outside of the team's doctors that got things figured out:

“Knowing that, if I don’t do this right, [Andrews] said you can either pitch four or five starts in the last half of the season and hopefully we’re lucky enough to go to the playoffs and pitch in the playoffs. Or you can do it wrong and not pitch at all.” - Blay Cuchholz (7/24/13)

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 8:45 pm
by philpritchard
You'd think with Farrell's track record of working really well with pitchers he could have at least taught them how to not get caught doctoring a ball.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 10:03 pm
by MattA75
philpritchard wrote:You'd think with Farrell's track record of working really well with pitchers he could have at least taught them how to not get caught doctoring a ball.
he should just get the entire Red Sox major and minor league staffs on the Cardinals, *ahem*, "system"

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 11:11 pm
by numbers
Do we really want to start pointing these things out constantly? Like every team in the league doesnt have 8 guys doing something to the ball?

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 11:29 pm
by elliseamos
numbers wrote:Do we really want to start pointing these things out constantly? Like every team in the league doesnt have 8 guys doing something to the ball?
it's just a shame that it's so obvious, but who cares! THE SOX ARE 3 WINS AWAY!!
Spoiler: show
Image
Image
Image

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 11:41 pm
by 15showsandcounting
Do work, Wacha. The entire series rests on your shoulders, imo.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu October 24, 2013 11:59 pm
by elliseamos
JT just re-wrote the national anthem.

thanks, Obama... :shake:

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 25, 2013 12:47 am
by Harry Lime
So apparently in the off season David Ortiz spends most of his time with his family in the quiet town of Kaukauna, Wisconsin. I guess early on he'd go to low key bars around town and nobody knew who the big black guy was. Shit, that town is like 45 mins from my parents house. Come December I'm gonna go look for the Big Papi.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 25, 2013 4:43 am
by Norah
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:You'd think with Farrell's track record of working really well with pitchers he could have at least taught them how to not get caught doctoring a ball.
he should just get the entire Red Sox major and minor league staffs on the Cardinals, *ahem*, "system"
I listen to Felger & Mazz too!

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 25, 2013 5:37 am
by matt reeder
numbers wrote:Do we really want to start pointing these things out constantly? Like every team in the league doesnt have 8 guys doing something to the ball?
I don't care at all. It's a non-issue. It's the kind of thing that only needs to be called out if it's really, really obvious.
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:You'd think with Farrell's track record of working really well with pitchers he could have at least taught them how to not get caught doctoring a ball.
he should just get the entire Red Sox major and minor league staffs on the Cardinals, *ahem*, "system"
Which also includes having a pitching staff full of youngsters who throw 95+.

The Cardinals embarrassed themselves in Game 1. They haven't played that bad all year and I don't know if it was Fenway, the 4 day layoff, the jitters or what. It was just awful to watch as a fan. Tonight was a lot better.

We have a series now.

Re: MLB

Posted: Fri October 25, 2013 1:20 pm
by philpritchard
matt reeder wrote:
numbers wrote:Do we really want to start pointing these things out constantly? Like every team in the league doesnt have 8 guys doing something to the ball?
I don't care at all. It's a non-issue. It's the kind of thing that only needs to be called out if it's really, really obvious.
That was kind of my point in the initial post about it. I get that everyone does it, and for the most part it's not a big deal, but how have Lester and Buchholz (and the Miami guy who spit on the ball, only that one was hilarious) managed to be so obvious about it?

And if the league is going to so obviously turn a blind eye to it and pretend nothing's happening, why not just change the rule and allow it?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:06 am
by MadTIGERmaN
Harry Lime wrote:So apparently in the off season David Ortiz spends most of his time with his family in the quiet town of Kaukauna, Wisconsin. I guess early on he'd go to low key bars around town and nobody knew who the big black guy was. Shit, that town is like 45 mins from my parents house. Come December I'm gonna go look for the Big Papi.
I actually used to hang out with a girl, who ran into him one night. Just happened she just that summer went to a Sox game at Fenway with her dad / had a Sox hat... had it on at the bar... as soon as she saw him, and he saw her, he was like "aww fuck... " but he was really nice and talked to awhile and told her basically the same story... he goes to this lil bars... and every now and then people would be like "are you on the packers?" LOL think his Wife was from up there if I remember right?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 6:44 am
by Harry Lime
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:So apparently in the off season David Ortiz spends most of his time with his family in the quiet town of Kaukauna, Wisconsin. I guess early on he'd go to low key bars around town and nobody knew who the big black guy was. Shit, that town is like 45 mins from my parents house. Come December I'm gonna go look for the Big Papi.
I actually used to hang out with a girl, who ran into him one night. Just happened she just that summer went to a Sox game at Fenway with her dad / had a Sox hat... had it on at the bar... as soon as she saw him, and he saw her, he was like "aww fuck... " but he was really nice and talked to awhile and told her basically the same story... he goes to this lil bars... and every now and then people would be like "are you on the packers?" LOL think his Wife was from up there if I remember right?

Yeah, she is, but i just read that they're getting a divorce. Sumofbitch. I wanted to go Papi hunting. But I read off wiki that he has turned into a Packer fan. And his kids will be in Kaukauna with mom probably, so maybe he'll be around still.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 27, 2013 2:39 am
by daft twat
Anyone else currently enjoying this game? Also, God Bless America guy fucking killed it.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 27, 2013 2:54 am
by Chris_H_2
What a bullshit HBP to Beltran.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 27, 2013 3:29 am
by The Argonaut
I really thought Kozma had that ball up the middle. Damn

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 27, 2013 4:07 am
by The Argonaut
Iffy call. Middlebrooks belongs there. Did he try to trip Craig on purpose, or was he just trying to stand up. Should Craig have been able to jump over him? They'll be talking abot it for a while.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun October 27, 2013 4:08 am
by MadTIGERmaN
holy fuck what an ending!

and thats... wow calling that to end the game? thats like calling pass interference on a jump ball in the endzone to end a football game if you ask me... Middlebrooks had a right to that ball, he was still laying in that spot... thats a tough one to swallow