2017 NFL Season

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by Electromatic »

bune wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Gruden gets 10 years $100 million from Raiders.
So he's going to go to the Raiders with all of the Bucs plays so he can beat them in the Super Bowl, right.
Spider 2 Y Banana
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by Monkey_Driven »

I'm kind of excited to watch the NFL this weekend. But looking forward to the National Championship on Monday more.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by Green Habit »

@SkitchP wrote:
PHATJ wrote:Gruden gets 10 years $100 million from Raiders.
Alt Title: Rooney Rule blatantly skirted with absolutely no ramifications.
Probably goes to just confirm how incompetent Matt Millen was in that he couldn't even find a way to skirt it.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by numbers »

In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by numbers »

I definitely think the Rooney rule is a good thing. Even if you know who you are going to hire, it gives guys that might get overlooked a chance to kill an interview. Maybe they don’t get the job they interviewed for, but they might get another interview off of that one that leads to a hire.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

numbers wrote:I definitely think the Rooney rule is a good thing. Even if you know who you are going to hire, it gives guys that might get overlooked a chance to kill an interview. Maybe they don’t get the job they interviewed for, but they might get another interview off of that one that leads to a hire.
Stop making sense here, numbers.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
numbers wrote:I definitely think the Rooney rule is a good thing. Even if you know who you are going to hire, it gives guys that might get overlooked a chance to kill an interview. Maybe they don’t get the job they interviewed for, but they might get another interview off of that one that leads to a hire.
Stop making sense here, numbers.
This is the only logical reason why the Rooney rules makes any sense in a case like this.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
I mean...
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
I mean...
I never thought I’d have any reason to say this but... fuck you, Joey. :finger:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
I mean...
I never thought I’d have any reason to say this but... fuck you, Joey. :finger:
A well thought out and considered argument. :shake:
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by PHATJ »

durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
I mean...
I never thought I’d have any reason to say this but... fuck you, Joey. :finger:
A well thought out and considered argument. :shake:
Lol. As if calling me racist based on literally zero evidence is some sort of well thought argument. You should be embarrassed.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85143
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by epilogue »

PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
PHATJ wrote:
numbers wrote:In the Raiders defense, they have one of the better track records when it comes to hiring minority coaches.
In the defense of reason, the Raiders knew exactly who they wanted and why they want him. Hell, there are probably 20 teams that would trade their coach for Gruden if given the chance. In situations like this, the Rooney rule is silly and meaningless. And making a minority coach interview for a job that he has zero chance at getting seems patronizing and demeaning in itself.
1. There is no defense for the Raiders.
2. The Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless.
3. Don't be stupid.
Those are bad points. And yes it is.
They aren't and no it isn't. But keep telling yourself that.
Please explain why in this specific Raiders/Gruden situation they should be required to interview anyone else. And why would anyone else (not just minority coaches) want to interview for a job that is already publicly known to be going to someone else? Wouldn’t it be especially condescending to interview a minority coach simply to meet the standards of the Rooney rule when the team has zero interest in hiring anyone else? I mean a white coach wouldn’t have to put up with that silly charade. Seems kinda racist to make the minority candidate do all the extra work in preparation for a completely meaningless interview.

No, but you’re right Joey, the Rooney rule is never silly or meaningless. Lolz
Racists think everything is funny. Weird.
Did you just call me racist? What the fuck.
I mean...
I never thought I’d have any reason to say this but... fuck you, Joey. :finger:
A well thought out and considered argument. :shake:
Lol. As if calling me racist based on literally zero evidence is some sort of well thought argument. You should be embarrassed.
Ok.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: 2017 NFL Season

Post by 96583UP »

the raiders employed Art Shell for years, and Hue Jackson. so they are def not an organization that appears to be racist. just one that knows they want Chucky back so they can win, and get sponsorship dollars and put asses in the seats when they move to las vegas.

what is the fine for not following the rooney rule?

maybe they just pay it and acknowledge that they had a particular guy in mind they wanted to bring back. companies do that all the time.

rather than interviewing someone in bad faith just because of the color of their skin
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply