Re: MLB
Posted: Sun April 25, 2021 10:33 pm
MadBum's game should be considered a no-hitter
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:MadBum's game should be considered a no-hitter
Correct. It didn’t count.numbers wrote:Wasnt there someone who took a no-hitter into the 10th and lost it there, and it didnt count as a no-hitter?
Pedro once brought a perfect game into the 10th and lost it. I also believe Rich Hill did something similar a few years ago.numbers wrote:Wasnt there someone who took a no-hitter into the 10th and lost it there, and it didnt count as a no-hitter?
Yes. It was a perfect game.Bammer wrote:We all know that Tigers pitcher (Gallaraga?) threw a no-no when the ump (Joyce?) fucked up the 27th out call at 1st base. That might have actually been a perfect game?
Not officially in the record books ... but we know.
it is, but i just take issue with the rulespike wrote:Official rule is you gotta pitch at least nine.
Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
i’m tempted to say that’s less worthy than a 7-inning no hitter...i just feel like the pitcher is being punished when the game length is shortened by rulenumbers wrote:Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
Is that even possible?numbers wrote:Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
If you're the home team, then yeah. You can pitch a 9-inning no hitter and give up any number of runs.Bammer wrote:Is that even possible?numbers wrote:Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
In fact, it's happened once; here's the game log: https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxe ... 4230.shtmlSimple Torture wrote:If you're the home team, then yeah. You can pitch a 9-inning no hitter and give up any number of runs.Bammer wrote:Is that even possible?numbers wrote:Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
how many times have you been hit by a fastball?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:they could walk or hit five batters in a row also
Sorry nevermind I was thinking perfect game not no-hitterSimple Torture wrote:If you're the home team, then yeah. You can pitch a 9-inning no hitter and give up any number of runs.Bammer wrote:Is that even possible?numbers wrote:Yeah. What if the pitcher does both but doesn't win the game? Thoughts?philpritchard wrote:I'm perfectly fine with an official no-hitter requiring both a complete game and at least nine innings.
i can’t remember if i was ever hit in little league...the one year i pitched i did hit a few in one inning thoughdoug rr wrote:how many times have you been hit by a fastball?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:they could walk or hit five batters in a row also