Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Thu December 19, 2013 3:32 am
forgot to add...i see JR Smith has taken 17 three point shots tonight.
oh my.
oh my.
They only need to win the home games!verb_to_trust wrote:Miami is going to have a very difficult time beating this pacers team in a seven game series....
Not really. If there was a foul it was well before the shot when George was coming off the screen. When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.verb_to_trust wrote:The fact boy George missed so far to the right kind of proves lebron changed the shot with the contact. Tough call to see though, most refs are probably not looking for that there.
Yes, but Indiana is going to have a very difficult time beating this Heat team in a seven game series.verb_to_trust wrote:Miami is going to have a very difficult time beating this pacers team in a seven game series....
Yeah it's pretty absurd.red calzolaio wrote:my lord, i don't remember this much post game coverage/talk about a regular season game.
doesn't matter if the shot wasn't altered because of contact. you can't be doing this:4/5 wrote:When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.


red calzolaio wrote:doesn't matter if the shot wasn't altered because of contact. you can't be doing this:4/5 wrote:When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.
but i guess it's nothing because espn isn't talking about it today.

Hey I'm a Heat fan so I'm not claiming that I'm not biased, but I really and truly don't think that was a foul. That still photograph doesn't tell anything. Only the video could show whether that was a foul or not. That hand did no more than graze his jersey. It didn't redirect him, didn't push him, nothing. If they call that then we would literally have a foul called on every single possession of every game.red calzolaio wrote:doesn't matter if the shot wasn't altered because of contact. you can't be doing this:4/5 wrote:When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.
but i guess it's nothing because espn isn't talking about it today.
Electromatic wrote:Didn't Jordan once push a guy down (no call) to win a playoff game against the jazz?

Monkey_Driven wrote:Electromatic wrote:Didn't Jordan once push a guy down (no call) to win a playoff game against the jazz?
The Heat have fans?4/5 wrote:Hey I'm a Heat fan so I'm not claiming that I'm not biased, but I really and truly don't think that was a foul. That still photograph doesn't tell anything. Only the video could show whether that was a foul or not. That hand did no more than graze his jersey. It didn't redirect him, didn't push him, nothing. If they call that then we would literally have a foul called on every single possession of every game.red calzolaio wrote:doesn't matter if the shot wasn't altered because of contact. you can't be doing this:4/5 wrote:When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.
but i guess it's nothing because espn isn't talking about it today.
It was a good game and the refs made some tough calls against both teams. Maybe that was one against the Pacers. I don't think it was, but hey.
I believe they are called attendees.matt reeder wrote:The Heat have fans?4/5 wrote:Hey I'm a Heat fan so I'm not claiming that I'm not biased, but I really and truly don't think that was a foul. That still photograph doesn't tell anything. Only the video could show whether that was a foul or not. That hand did no more than graze his jersey. It didn't redirect him, didn't push him, nothing. If they call that then we would literally have a foul called on every single possession of every game.red calzolaio wrote:doesn't matter if the shot wasn't altered because of contact. you can't be doing this:4/5 wrote:When he went up for the shot the contact was minimal and not even close to changing the shot or being a foul. And I think his foot was on the line anyway, but either way that's not a call that should be made.
but i guess it's nothing because espn isn't talking about it today.
It was a good game and the refs made some tough calls against both teams. Maybe that was one against the Pacers. I don't think it was, but hey.
as did Reggie Miller.Monkey_Driven wrote:Electromatic wrote:Didn't Jordan once push a guy down (no call) to win a playoff game against the jazz?
That "push" is so over rated. His hand slide across Russell. What do people think Russell knew exactly when Jordan was going to stop and the fact he went on another step was because he was pushed? Ya right.Electromatic wrote:Didn't Jordan once push a guy down (no call) to win a playoff game against the jazz?