Re: 2015 All-Time Franchise Tournament: DAY TWENTY RESULTS
Posted: Thu February 25, 2016 12:07 am
ERA leaders with minimum 40IP:



I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.cutuphalfdead wrote:My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.@SkitchP wrote:stats updated.
and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.
Lament wrote:Skitch, you've got your rotations set to run through day 28, but the season ends after day 27. I don't know if this affects your pitching decisions, but I figured I'd point it out.
When I'm at work tomorrow I'll re-copy/paste all the games so we know it's good.@SkitchP wrote:I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.cutuphalfdead wrote:My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.@SkitchP wrote:stats updated.
and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.
cutuphalfdead wrote:When I'm at work tomorrow I'll re-copy/paste all the games so we know it's good.@SkitchP wrote:I see what happened. I had put some stats in the wrong line, and when I copied and pasted to fix it, it messed up one of the formulas. It's fixed now. Ill reupload the giants through 40.cutuphalfdead wrote:My sheet has 38 starts for the Giants with 38 games entered.@SkitchP wrote:stats updated.
and chud, somewhere I picked up an extra GS for the giants. I am not sure what i screwed up. If you happen to notice where, please let me know.

I don't have a column for plate appearances so I worked with what I have.@SkitchP wrote:lol at Rogers Horsnby being in the top 12 for 3 different teams.
and shouldnt that be plate appearances, not At Bats to determine eligibility?
cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
cutuphalfdead wrote:Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.
- Spoiler: show
Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.cutuphalfdead wrote:I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.
- Spoiler: show
Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.
Go fuck yourself, skitch patterson. You're more than welcome to download the sheet and add a stat.@SkitchP wrote:Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.cutuphalfdead wrote:I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.
- Spoiler: show
Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.
dont be salty chud.cutuphalfdead wrote:Go fuck yourself, skitch patterson. You're more than welcome to download the sheet and add a stat.@SkitchP wrote:Or you could just calculate leaderboards properly instead of being lazy.cutuphalfdead wrote:I could also just lower the AB threshold to include more of your players. Whether we use AB or PA it's entirely arbitrary.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Would any of those guys make the top 5?@SkitchP wrote:On my teams alone it would qualify 6 extra guys I think. Hard to tell because you only have my teams through 38.cutuphalfdead wrote:No. I doubt setting a PA thresh-hold instead of AB would change much.@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I guess I could calculate it but whatever
dont get lazy now mr fancy glasses
You've still included an inaccurate stat. My philosophy is if I don't have enough data to calculate the stat, I leave it out. But hey, I have standards.
- Spoiler: show
Also, serves you right for fielding a team of pussies who can't handle the grind of playing ball every day.