Red Mosquito

I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

The Science of Masking Kids at School Remains Uncertain

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08 ... rtain.html

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

wease wrote:Our most holy of governors has now recommended that our citizens stop asking for vaccine advice from their primary care providers or medical professionals and ask their pastors and priests at their church what they should do.

Haha oh wow man we live in two completely different worlds.

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

doubt it

B wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

THe study still says something along the lines of "but masking up and social distant is the best way"

Like every other study that comes out discussing mask mandates.

Strat wrote:

B wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

THe study still says something along the lines of "but masking up and social distant is the best way"

Like every other study that comes out discussing mask mandates.

Literally like every article about this

"“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,” says study leader Serhiy Yarusevych, a professor of mechanical and mechatronics engineering, in a university release. “However, there is a very serious difference in the effectiveness of different masks when it comes to controlling aerosols.”

Studies continue to show that aerosols exhaled by infected individuals can indeed infect others with COVID-19, even if someone is standing more than six feet away."

Which is one doctors/professionals have been saying since the beginning

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

doubt it

You're what, 50?

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

doubt it

You're what, 50?

what does age have to do with accosting strangers in public like a nut job?

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

doubt it

You're what, 50?

what does age have to do with accosting strangers in public like a nut job?

You're a weak and feeble target

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Most face masks won’t stop COVID-19 indoors, study warns

They are still terrified of admitting it:

“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,”

Fucking cucks

And I'm also tired of delusional morons suggesting n95s. Get a fucking grip on reality you fucking virgins.

Do you call people out in public for wearing masks? Call them cucks and virgins? You feel strongly about it, I hope you do. I would be so sad to learn that your toughness was just behind the keyboard

of course he doesn't

I'd definitely call you out for it. Get right up in your face.

doubt it

You're what, 50?

what does age have to do with accosting strangers in public like a nut job?

You're a weak and feeble target

please stop frightening grandmas, verb.

SARS Survivors Vaccinated Against Covid-19 May Have Super-Antibodies to Coronaviruses

https://gizmodo.com/sars-survivors-vacc ... 1847517837

I’d love to see a spike v. verb showdown live on PPV. If verb wins, spike has to let verb spit in his mouth. If spike wins, verb has to wear a mask everywhere for a year.

Strat wrote:

Strat wrote:

B wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

THe study still says something along the lines of "but masking up and social distant is the best way"

Like every other study that comes out discussing mask mandates.

Literally like every article about this

"“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,” says study leader Serhiy Yarusevych, a professor of mechanical and mechatronics engineering, in a university release. “However, there is a very serious difference in the effectiveness of different masks when it comes to controlling aerosols.”

Studies continue to show that aerosols exhaled by infected individuals can indeed infect others with COVID-19, even if someone is standing more than six feet away."

Which is one doctors/professionals have been saying since the beginning

"BUT MASKS ARE STILL GOOD" Is just something that needs to be said so some pink haired demisexual doesn't try and cancel them.

verb_to_trust wrote:

Strat wrote:

Strat wrote:

B wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

THe study still says something along the lines of "but masking up and social distant is the best way"

Like every other study that comes out discussing mask mandates.

Literally like every article about this

"“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,” says study leader Serhiy Yarusevych, a professor of mechanical and mechatronics engineering, in a university release. “However, there is a very serious difference in the effectiveness of different masks when it comes to controlling aerosols.”

Studies continue to show that aerosols exhaled by infected individuals can indeed infect others with COVID-19, even if someone is standing more than six feet away."

Which is one doctors/professionals have been saying since the beginning

"BUT MASKS ARE STILL GOOD" Is just something that needs to be said so some pink haired demisexual doesn't try and cancel them.

I just want to point out - this is one of our leading Covid scientists

Rangi Guy wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

Strat wrote:

Strat wrote:

B wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

B wrote:I question the validity of a website called studyfinds.org

what if it was studyfinds.edu?

Still shady. .info is the trustworthy domain.

THe study still says something along the lines of "but masking up and social distant is the best way"

Like every other study that comes out discussing mask mandates.

Literally like every article about this

"“There is no question it is beneficial to wear any face covering, both for protection in close proximity and at a distance in a room,” says study leader Serhiy Yarusevych, a professor of mechanical and mechatronics engineering, in a university release. “However, there is a very serious difference in the effectiveness of different masks when it comes to controlling aerosols.”

Studies continue to show that aerosols exhaled by infected individuals can indeed infect others with COVID-19, even if someone is standing more than six feet away."

Which is one doctors/professionals have been saying since the beginning

"BUT MASKS ARE STILL GOOD" Is just something that needs to be said so some pink haired demisexual doesn't try and cancel them.

I just want to point out - this is one of our leading Covid scientists

Lol, trust The Science™.

macphisto wrote:I’d love to see a spike v. verb showdown live on PPV. If verb wins, spike has to let verb spit in his mouth. If spike wins, verb has to wear a mask everywhere for a year.

So horny

macphisto wrote:I’d love to see a spike v. verb showdown live on PPV. If verb wins, spike has to let verb spit in his mouth. If spike wins, verb has to wear a mask everywhere for a year.

Verb would lose and then claim that he won and that we're all cucks for believing what we saw with our own eyes.