The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40669
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by wease »

B wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
run2death wrote:Are we in double digits yet?
can we get an official list going? Because I'm pretty sure people are just counting the same ones over and over.

I have :

1. Ford: sexual assault in high school. no evidence. no witnesses. passed a lie detector test in which she was asked only two pertinent questions. 4 people swore she told them her story decades later, and this qualifies as proof somehow.

2. Ramirez: his dick was in her face at a party in college. won't testify without an investigation. no evidence. no witnesses.

3. Swetnick: saw him in line at a gang rape party in college, which apparently she frequented quite often, yet no one has ever heard of her or any of this. Has about as much credibility as pizzagate for a few reasons.

4. Some loon who called for a coup and accused Trump of manslaughter. later recanted, but #believesurvivors, right? (incredibly, this was considered to be a serious accusation, as CNN and others apparently considered it to have merit)

5. I think one more? some anonymous one. no date, place, names. but yeah I'm sure this is the one that will do him in.

Are we done with this bullshit now?
Well, Renate Schroeder, one of the 65 women who signed a letter of support for Kavanaugh found out this week that he was secretly calling her a slut behind her back when they released his yearbook of evidence of his high moral character.
Ha! What a douche.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
run2death
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5223
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm
Location: A Dark Place

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by run2death »

Image
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Electromatic »

BurtReynolds wrote:
run2death wrote:Are we in double digits yet?
can we get an official list going? Because I'm pretty sure people are just counting the same ones over and over.

I have :

1. Ford: sexual assault in high school. no evidence. no witnesses. passed a lie detector test in which she was asked only two pertinent questions. 4 people swore she told them her story decades later, and this qualifies as proof somehow.

2. Ramirez: his dick was in her face at a party in college. won't testify without an investigation. no evidence. no witnesses.

3. Swetnick: saw him in line at a gang rape party in college, which apparently she frequented quite often, yet no one has ever heard of her or any of this. Has about as much credibility as pizzagate for a few reasons.

4. Some loon who called for a coup and accused Trump of manslaughter. later recanted, but #believesurvivors, right? (incredibly, this was considered to be a serious accusation, as CNN and others apparently considered it to have merit)

5. I think one more? some anonymous one. no date, place, names. but yeah I'm sure this is the one that will do him in.

Are we done with this bullshit now?
The due date for being done is November 6th or so.... until then, probably one a week.
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by --- »

BurtReynolds wrote:Who was under the delusion that the supreme court nomination process wasn't political before this?
Thought of this post after reading something about the history of confirmations and confirmation hearings the other day.

Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed 96-3, and Clarence Thomas was confirmed by a Democratic-majority Senate. The process might have always been political, but it's never been this partisan. I'm not optimistic we'll ever get back to the point where this process - any political process, really - isn't hopelessly compromised by partisan fatuousness.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21688
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

There's a lot going on, but I don't want the day to move on much further before we acknowledge that Grassley cannot pronounce the name "Ramirez" (and it's the first "r" that gives him trouble)
McParadigm wrote:lol
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by digster »

This setup is absolutely bizarre. I know why the Republicans did it, but it's still asinine.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

Grassley is cracking me up
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

This is actually quite heartbreaking
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15599
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Strat wrote:This is actually quite heartbreaking
i know you meant nothing by it, but in case you did, why the use of the word "actually?"
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

Judge looked sick at work because he was hungover, clearly
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

meatwad wrote:Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
He's an awful human being.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

He knows where every Dairy Queen is in Iowa
Dick/Balls
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

This is such a shit show. These breaks every 5 minutes so that this God awful panel can interject their political ramblings is really distracting. We just need linear questioning from the bull dyke lawyer lady uninterrupted.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

meatwad wrote:Boy, Chuck Grassley doesn't come off like an angry old grandpa at all.
Former political director for the RNC and still working GOP campaign strategist:
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

I wonder if Coke had to pay for this product placement.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

I can't believe Republicans let this move forward. I can't understand why Kavanaugh is their man until the bitter end, but I think by the end of the day it's going to be clear he won't be confirmed. And what a disaster that is a month before the midterms.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

meatwad wrote:I can't believe Republicans let this move forward. I can't understand why Kavanaugh is their man until the bitter end, but I think by the end of the day it's going to be clear he won't be confirmed. And what a disaster that is a month before the midterms.
If the White House wont pull him and he won’t step aside, their only real options are “investigate the claims properly, and risk running out of time to get a replacement lined up,” or “rush the defense and then let him fail in a full vote.”
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by bada »

Ugh Blumenthal.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

bada wrote:Ugh Blumenthal.
Yeah.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
Post Reply