Re: Things you have an irrational hatred of
Posted: Wed March 22, 2023 1:43 pm
i'm just doing my best to make the content fit the thread titles, respectivelyEllo Sailor wrote:You already knew that! You tricked me!
i'm just doing my best to make the content fit the thread titles, respectivelyEllo Sailor wrote:You already knew that! You tricked me!
But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
If the batter makes it to first base, what's the difference?wease wrote:Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
I just told you the difference. It wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:If the batter makes it to first base, what's the difference?wease wrote:Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
So just stop thinking of batting average as hits/no hits and instead.. wait.. don't they already have an "on base percentage"? I haven't paid attention to baseball in years.wease wrote:I just told you the difference. It wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:If the batter makes it to first base, what's the difference?wease wrote:Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
I agree with bammer. If a batter walks, it should be an at bat. You can’t walk unless you’re up there AT BAT. But because they have no way of incorporating that into the batting average they’re only considered as a plate appearance.
In baseball statistics, on-base percentage (OBP) is a measure of how often a batter reaches base for any reason other than a fielding error, fielder's choice, dropped or uncaught third strike, fielder's obstruction, or catcher's interference. OBP is calculated in Major League Baseball (MLB) by dividing the sum of hits, walks, and times hit by a pitch by the sum of at-bats, walks, times hit by pitch and sacrifice flies.[1tree_ wrote:So just stop thinking of batting average as hits/no hits and instead.. wait.. don't they already have an "on base percentage"? I haven't paid attention to baseball in years.wease wrote:I just told you the difference. It wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:If the batter makes it to first base, what's the difference?wease wrote:Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
I agree with bammer. If a batter walks, it should be an at bat. You can’t walk unless you’re up there AT BAT. But because they have no way of incorporating that into the batting average they’re only considered as a plate appearance.
I don't like that sacrifice flies are part of the denominatorknee tunes wrote:In baseball statistics, on-base percentage (OBP) is a measure of how often a batter reaches base for any reason other than a fielding error, fielder's choice, dropped or uncaught third strike, fielder's obstruction, or catcher's interference. OBP is calculated in Major League Baseball (MLB) by dividing the sum of hits, walks, and times hit by a pitch by the sum of at-bats, walks, times hit by pitch and sacrifice flies.[1tree_ wrote:So just stop thinking of batting average as hits/no hits and instead.. wait.. don't they already have an "on base percentage"? I haven't paid attention to baseball in years.wease wrote:I just told you the difference. It wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:If the batter makes it to first base, what's the difference?wease wrote:Because it wasn’t a hit.tree_ wrote:I don't see why they couldn't count it as a single.wease wrote:But if it did, it would have to be figured into the batting average wouldn’t it?Bammer wrote:Invariably when a batter works the count for a well-earned walk, the announcer says it was a “good at bat.”
I hate that a walk doesn’t count as an at bat.
I agree with bammer. If a batter walks, it should be an at bat. You can’t walk unless you’re up there AT BAT. But because they have no way of incorporating that into the batting average they’re only considered as a plate appearance.
Short for "charisma"bodysnatcher wrote:Never heard of that but already hate it
Oh godJorge wrote:Short for "charisma"bodysnatcher wrote:Never heard of that but already hate it