Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS
Posted: Fri January 24, 2025 8:35 pm
Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
We're talking about U/You, not Hold On!wease wrote:The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
Sad is the best song on LD and probably the best song they ever kept off an album.epilogue wrote:We're talking about U/You, not Hold On!wease wrote:The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
wease wrote:Sad is the best song on LD and probably the best song they ever kept off an album.epilogue wrote:We're talking about U/You, not Hold On!wease wrote:The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
wease wrote:Sad is the best song on LD and probably the best song they ever kept off an album.epilogue wrote:We're talking about U/You, not Hold On!wease wrote:The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
How can you be wrong this many times in one day?dimejinky99 wrote:wease wrote:Sad is the best song on LD and probably the best song they ever kept off an album.epilogue wrote:We're talking about U/You, not Hold On!wease wrote:The only thing I remember talking about around that time was people thinking Dave A played on Hold On because the liner notes said it was recorded during the Vs sessions. It was obvious it was Krusen just by listening but some couldn’t accept the liner notes could be wrong.epilogue wrote:I talked about this ad nauseum when LD first came out. It didn't get much traction then either.wease wrote:I’m gonna have to do this back-to-back thing again. I’ve never noticed this.VinylGuy wrote:the music is the same than in the single but the vocals and lyrics are different. The U single is about being in love while the LD is the breakup song.wease wrote:Hmm. I don’t think I’ve heard about the new vocal for LD before. And honestly, I wasn’t even listening to that part of it. I was more focused on the instrumentation.tragabigzanda wrote:Lost Dogs version is the same B-side instrumental, but with a new vocal, and then remixed.wease wrote:I don’t buy the notion the b-side U is different from the Lost Dogs version. I just listened to both back-to-back and other than the mastering, they sound exactly alike. I also don’t agree that Matt is on the Lost Dogs version and not the b-side. The drums are exactly the same. I actually don’t think Matt is on it at all. The fills sound much more like Jack fills than Matt fills and the whole groove of the tune swings more like Jack than Matt.
Its pretty brilliant.
Absolute poppycock
Fatal and strangest tribe are right there
wutBirds in Hell wrote:Sad is OK but it's no Of the Earth.