Page 68 of 175
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 4:38 pm
by numbers
For example, I don't think Fisk or Pesky's numbers should be retired. Rice fits all their hard ass criteria so he's ok.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:14 pm
by Norah
Clemens number belongs up there too.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:20 pm
by Simple Torture
I think we can comfortably say that the next number to go up there will be 34. After that? I can't think of who will be next. I assume it won't be Clemens or Manny, considering their reputations, and after Boggs I think the '80s and '90s are done. Does anyone else deserve a second look?
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:24 pm
by Norah
You're probably right.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:25 pm
by Simple Torture
2?
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:27 pm
by Simple Torture
I hope I didn't jinx it.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:39 pm
by numbers
Clemens and Ortiz are the two currently not up there that I would retire.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 5:59 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:Clemens and Ortiz are the two currently not up there that I would retire.
I put Clemens and Boggs on the same level in terms of both talent and stature. So it's weird to see you on board for one but not the other.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:40 pm
by numbers
There's just something about Boggs that was, for lack of a better word, meh.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:43 pm
by EJ
Simple Torture wrote:Does anyone else deserve a second look?
Mo Vaughn shoulda been that guy.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:48 pm
by Norah
You mean the guy who has the best BA in Fenway history? Yeah, totally meh.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:48 pm
by numbers
Can there be one thing left that doesn't get swallowed up by analytics?
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:49 pm
by numbers
Nobody likes Boggs, no one cared when he left, and no one has been like "gee where's Wade Boggs?" since he retired.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:50 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:Can there be one thing left that doesn't get swallowed up by analytics?
Yeah, those pesky analytics like how often a guy hits the baseball
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:52 pm
by numbers
This isnt the HOF, its not an award, and it shouldnt be something solely decided by Wins Above Replacement or OPS. It's totally subjective, I didnt like Boggs and I wasnt alone. If he was such a slam dunk it would have happened 10 years ago.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:57 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I dig numbers' passion about this. As a general baseball fan I always thought Boggs was borderline all-time great. But as numbers is a Red Sox fan I get his doubts.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 8:59 pm
by Norah
Wade Boggs is one of the best third basemen to ever play baseball, and has hit the ball more in Fenway Park than anyone ever has, including Ted Williams.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 9:00 pm
by numbers
And yet, his career is largely forgotten.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 9:01 pm
by numbers
I'm not even saying he wasn't a great player, but the Red Sox should only retire the numbers of players who were iconic figures, which Boggs never was.
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 9:01 pm
by Norah
Well maybe this will get people to wise up.