Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon March 21, 2016 8:28 pm
Daisy Ridley as Lara Croft?
She does seem like an odd choice. Maybe they're doing an origin story?CopperTom wrote:Daisy Ridley as Lara Croft?
She's more like the new games Lara.LoathedVermin72 wrote:She does seem like an odd choice. Maybe they're doing an origin story?CopperTom wrote:Daisy Ridley as Lara Croft?
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. That's a good thing, I'd say.CopperTom wrote:She's more like the new games Lara.LoathedVermin72 wrote:She does seem like an odd choice. Maybe they're doing an origin story?CopperTom wrote:Daisy Ridley as Lara Croft?
Yes. Both were excellent.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. That's a good thing, I'd say.CopperTom wrote:She's more like the new games Lara.LoathedVermin72 wrote:She does seem like an odd choice. Maybe they're doing an origin story?CopperTom wrote:Daisy Ridley as Lara Croft?
Wasn't the first of the new games an origin story? (I didn't play it.)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Gibson is maybe my favorite actor

Bringing this over from the other thread. Seriously, joey? You thought the trailer was that bad? Made me want to see it.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, I've only seen one trailer. But aside from the terrible acting and the abysmal writing (though, to be fair, it is only a trailer) have we talked about how the fucking thing is called Blood Father?Kaius wrote:What's wrong with Blood Father?
The acting and writing are like the main reasons that trailer sells me. Weird.E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, I've only seen one trailer. But aside from the terrible acting and the abysmal writing (though, to be fair, it is only a trailer) have we talked about how the fucking thing is called Blood Father?Kaius wrote:What's wrong with Blood Father?
goddamn rightKaius wrote:What a voice that guy has. Like 1000 years of life experience dragged over the coals and forced to read to his children before they're sent off to war.
"Missing link tattoo."E.H. Ruddock wrote:Bringing this over from the other thread. Seriously, joey? You thought the trailer was that bad? Made me want to see it.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, I've only seen one trailer. But aside from the terrible acting and the abysmal writing (though, to be fair, it is only a trailer) have we talked about how the fucking thing is called Blood Father?Kaius wrote:What's wrong with Blood Father?
Just stifled and obvious and hammy and cringy. I don't know. It's just a trailer. The movie might be fantastic. But it's a terrible trailer.LoathedVermin72 wrote:The acting and writing are like the main reasons that trailer sells me. Weird.E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, I've only seen one trailer. But aside from the terrible acting and the abysmal writing (though, to be fair, it is only a trailer) have we talked about how the fucking thing is called Blood Father?Kaius wrote:What's wrong with Blood Father?