Page 68 of 169

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 8:29 pm
by bart
cutuphalfdead wrote:
bart wrote:
stip wrote:Image
What kind of rich New Englander vacations in Georgia, anyway?
New York is not New England.
I'll just see myself out.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:14 pm
by 96583UP
dimejinky99 wrote:As far as I'm aware, he forwent his fee for last night in exchange for a big donation to some charity. Jus sayin.
good

Image

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:16 pm
by 96583UP
FDR would have loved Salesforce.com

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:22 pm
by dimejinky99
96583UP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:As far as I'm aware, he forwent his fee for last night in exchange for a big donation to some charity. Jus sayin.
good

Image

This has no basis in fact. I just like defending Eddie.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:26 pm
by malice
96583UP wrote:FDR would have loved Salesforce.com
and so dies my sincere hope to never have to encounter that website name again in my life

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:28 pm
by 96583UP
dimejinky99 wrote:
96583UP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:As far as I'm aware, he forwent his fee for last night in exchange for a big donation to some charity. Jus sayin.
good

Image
This has no basis in fact. I just like defending Eddie.
i see. thank you for your candor

Image

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:31 pm
by 96583UP
malice wrote:
96583UP wrote:FDR would have loved Salesforce.com
and so dies my sincere hope to never have to encounter that website name again in my life
now how would Ed feel about that?

clearly they are a reputable enough cause for him to attach his name to

much like women's rights, the pro-choice movement, vote for change

salesforce.com support is no different than civil rights and or suffrage

do you never want to encounter civil rights or suffrage?

let us not flee in fear from our progressive destiny

ALL HAIL SALESFORCE.COM AND BOW IN THE WARM SHADOW OF ITS PROGRESSIVE GLORY!!!!!!!!!

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Sun March 23, 2014 9:34 pm
by malice
96583UP wrote:
malice wrote:
96583UP wrote:FDR would have loved Salesforce.com
and so dies my sincere hope to never have to encounter that website name again in my life
now how would Ed feel about that?

clearly they are a reputable enough cause for him to attach his name to

much like women's rights, the pro-choice movement, vote for change

salesforce.com support is no different than civil rights and or suffrage

do you never want to encounter civil rights or suffrage?

let us not flee in fear from our progressive destiny

ALL HAIL SALESFORCE.COM AND BOW IN THE WARM SHADOW OF ITS PROGRESSIVE GLORY!!!!!!!!!
they lost my respect when they acquired jigsaw.com (now data.com)

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 2:18 am
by given2trade
Lament wrote:
twoheadedboy wrote:Sheesh, Oracle's biggest competitor in the CRM/SaaS front. Clearly Ed has no shame.
Wait, is that really true? I'm curious because one of the big defenses I heard for Pearl Jam playing that Oracle thing was that Ed was super tight with the founder or CEO or something like that...
First, Oracle CEO is one of the worst people on the planet. You're referring to Ed playing RealNetworks founder's birthday. It's so hard to keep track of all the events Ed has played in the past.

And in conclusion, if ya'll didn't care about the Oracle event or the Target event, why care about this?

The band fucking blows compared to what they were 10-15 years ago - and it's not just the shitty music they've put out. If you want to continue thinking it's the same thing, that's fine.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 2:23 am
by dimejinky99
There's a song on that set list called long shadow.

This a new song?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 2:27 am
by EJ
given2trade wrote:
And in conclusion, if ya'll didn't care about the Oracle event or the Target event, why care about this?
Agreed. That ship set sail years ago.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 2:31 am
by dimejinky99
So if any of you guys had huge amounts of money and could hire pj or ed for a private party for you and your friends, you wouldn't do it?

I would. In a heartbeat.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 2:45 am
by Birds in Hell
given2trade wrote:
Lament wrote:
twoheadedboy wrote:Sheesh, Oracle's biggest competitor in the CRM/SaaS front. Clearly Ed has no shame.
Wait, is that really true? I'm curious because one of the big defenses I heard for Pearl Jam playing that Oracle thing was that Ed was super tight with the founder or CEO or something like that...
First, Oracle CEO is one of the worst people on the planet. You're referring to Ed playing RealNetworks founder's birthday. It's so hard to keep track of all the events Ed has played in the past.

And in conclusion, if ya'll didn't care about the Oracle event or the Target event, why care about this?

The band fucking blows compared to what they were 10-15 years ago - and it's not just the shitty music they've put out. If you want to continue thinking it's the same thing, that's fine.
Real talk.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 3:32 am
by verb_to_trust
dimejinky99 wrote:There's a song on that set list called long shadow.

This a new song?
Isn't that a Joe Strummer song off Streetcore? Its just the sort of song Ed would blandly cover and fuck up the words to, so I bet that's it....

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 4:07 am
by PryTo
given2trade wrote: First, Oracle CEO is one of the worst people on the planet. You're referring to Ed playing RealNetworks founder's birthday. It's so hard to keep track of all the events Ed has played in the past.

And in conclusion, if ya'll didn't care about the Oracle event or the Target event, why care about this?

The band fucking blows compared to what they were 10-15 years ago - and it's not just the shitty music they've put out. If you want to continue thinking it's the same thing, that's fine.
I gotta agree. This band/Ed really, truly, genuinely blows these days. I suppose if the music was great it wouldn't matter but the music is just meh. Just the thought of any multi millionaire musician playing a show for some corporation called salesforce.com makes my skin crawl. This is like Justin Bieber-level shit, for realz.

Image

And dude looks like a freakin' superdouche to top it off. You're 50 years old, cool guy. I put PJ on an equal level with Nickelback at this point. I wish I was kidding. That doesn't take away from the many years of great music, but this is yet another fuck you to the fans and a blatant cash grab. Even if the money went to charity, it's gross. You don't need the money Mr. Millionaire and salesforce.com ain't the only way to raise bucks if your name is Eddie Vedder. As always, the sheep on the main board are saying shit like, "I trust Ed." Go fuck yourself.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 5:07 am
by BurtReynolds
I'm surprised such a controversial topic is allowed on the official board.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 6:35 am
by Leatherhead
So would this be better?

Corporate Douchenozzle says, "Hey Eddie Vedder, if you play this private gig for us that'll take less than an hour, we'll give $1,000,000 to a charity of your choosing."

Eddie Vedder says, "Naaaah, no thanks, I'm far too cool for that corporate shit. My indie cred is definitely worth more to me than $1,000,000 is to that charity."

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 7:55 am
by Lament
Leatherhead wrote:So would this be better?

Corporate Douchenozzle says, "Hey Eddie Vedder, if you play this private gig for us that'll take less than an hour, we'll give $1,000,000 to a charity of your choosing."

Eddie Vedder says, "Naaaah, no thanks, I'm far too cool for that corporate shit. My indie cred is definitely worth more to me than $1,000,000 is to that charity."
It's too bad that the person who suggested it was done for charity (dime) then posted that he had no reason to actually believe it was.


But anyways, I heard they made the last three albums cause someone was like "HEY PEARL JAM, RELEASE THREE SUBSTANDARD ALBUMS IN A ROW AND I WILL DONATE ONE GAZILLION DOLLARS TO THE CHARITY OF YOUR CHOICE." So by not loving those three records, you are basically saying you hate charity.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 9:40 am
by twoheadedboy
Leatherhead wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:None of Pearl Jam's moneygrabbing affects how much I like this band. They're artists, they get paid to create and perform their art, that's all.

The problem is, their moneygrabbing in a lot of cases is in direct contradiction to the content of their art.
There's no crossover though, for me. Moneygrabbing is over there, art is over here. Terrible people with ridiculous beliefs/principles/practices make great art all the time. And I'm not sure anything can be in direct contradiction to sounds arranged in a certain way so that it sounds good to my ears/brain/mind.
This is about photographers, but can apply to any artist: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Mon March 24, 2014 10:35 am
by stip
PryTo wrote:
given2trade wrote: First, Oracle CEO is one of the worst people on the planet. You're referring to Ed playing RealNetworks founder's birthday. It's so hard to keep track of all the events Ed has played in the past.

And in conclusion, if ya'll didn't care about the Oracle event or the Target event, why care about this?

The band fucking blows compared to what they were 10-15 years ago - and it's not just the shitty music they've put out. If you want to continue thinking it's the same thing, that's fine.
I gotta agree. This band/Ed really, truly, genuinely blows these days. I suppose if the music was great it wouldn't matter but the music is just meh. Just the thought of any multi millionaire musician playing a show for some corporation called salesforce.com makes my skin crawl. This is like Justin Bieber-level shit, for realz.

Image

And dude looks like a freakin' superdouche to top it off. You're 50 years old, cool guy. I put PJ on an equal level with Nickelback at this point. I wish I was kidding. That doesn't take away from the many years of great music, but this is yet another fuck you to the fans and a blatant cash grab. Even if the money went to charity, it's gross. You don't need the money Mr. Millionaire and salesforce.com ain't the only way to raise bucks if your name is Eddie Vedder. As always, the sheep on the main board are saying shit like, "I trust Ed." Go fuck yourself.
The interesting thing about some of these posts is the way they approach an almost 'stalking my ex' level of creepy intensity.

Which, in a way, is exactly what they are.